FSO Transceiver Link Predictor and Scheduler for Atmospheric Scintillation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Free-space optical (FSO) communication systems face challenges in maintaining quality of service (QoS) due to atmospheric scintillation and intermittent beam blockages, which affect data transmission reliability and throughput.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a link predictor to estimate future seeing conditions and a scheduler to assign packets to blocks of time based on QoS parameters, ensuring optimal transmission windows and minimizing the impact of network fades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If FSO communication uses fixed transmission schedules, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to adapt to atmospheric scintillation and beam blockages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission scheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic transmission scheduling by dividing the future time window into multiple blocks and assigning different transmission strategies to each block based on predicted atmospheric conditions. The scheduler dynamically adjusts transmission parameters including retransmission attempts, packet prioritization, and modulation schemes according to real-time seeing condition predictions, transforming the fixed schedule into an adaptive system that responds to atmospheric variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action through the link predictor that forecasts atmospheric conditions and transmission quality in advance. By predicting seeing conditions for future time blocks before actual transmission occurs, the system can pre-configure transmission parameters, allocate resources, and prepare packet schedules optimally for anticipated conditions, avoiding reactive adjustments and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If FSO transmission continues during poor seeing conditions, then productivity is maintained, but loss of information increases due to packet drops and retransmission failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission throughputVSAvoidpacket loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the scheduler continuously monitors actual transmission quality metrics including packet delivery ratios, error rates, and seeing condition measurements. This feedback is fed back into the link predictor to refine future predictions and into the scheduler to adjust transmission strategies in real-time, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to actual conditions rather than relying solely on predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of atmospheric scintillation and beam blockages into beneficial opportunities for optimization. By detecting and predicting these adverse conditions, the system uses them to trigger alternative transmission strategies such as packet prioritization, selective retransmission of critical data, and adjustment of modulation schemes, transforming the harmful atmospheric variations into cues for improved transmission decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If FSO system implements advanced scheduling based on link prediction, then quality of service is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of serviceVSAvoidscheduler processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the transmission schedule into discrete time blocks, each with its own set of transmission parameters and packet assignments. This segmentation allows the complex scheduling problem to be divided into manageable units that can be processed and optimized independently, reducing the computational burden on the scheduler while maintaining overall QoS performance through coordinated management of individual blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by adjusting key transmission parameters such as transmission power, modulation index, packet size, and retransmission thresholds based on predicted seeing conditions. By varying these parameters adaptively across different time blocks and atmospheric conditions, the system optimizes QoS performance without requiring complex control mechanisms, using straightforward parameter adjustment rather than complex algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9503183B2Free space optical transceiver
Publication Date: 2016.11.22 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US9503183B2 patent drawing
  • US9503183B2 patent drawing
  • US9503183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A free-space optical (FSO) transceiver can include a link predictor configured to estimate conditions for an FSO link over a window of time in the future. The FSO transceiver can also include a scheduler configured to assign outgoing packets to blocks of time in the window of time based on quality of service (QoS) parameters of each of the outgoing packets and on conditions in each block of time in the window of time.