Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Fin Insert Thermal Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fischer-Tropsch reactors face high capacity-specific costs due to the need for numerous small catalyst-containing tubes for temperature control, limiting their scalability and efficiency in producing liquid hydrocarbon fuels from renewable energy sources.

Innovation Solution

The design of heat conducting fin inserts with an elongated center portion, cross members, and outer portions extending laterally from the cross members, optimized using systematic design tools to enhance thermal management and reduce material usage while maintaining temperature control, thereby improving reactor performance and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If a large number of small diameter catalyst-containing tubes are used for temperature control, then temperature control effectiveness is improved, but reactor cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidnumber of tubes
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is segmented into multiple small diameter tubes, each containing catalyst and equipped with fin inserts. This segmentation allows for improved temperature control through increased surface area while maintaining manageable individual tube dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Heat conducting fin inserts are nested inside the catalyst-containing tubes. The fins are positioned within the tube interior to maximize heat transfer surface area without increasing the external tube dimensions, effectively nesting one thermal management structure within another.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Temperature

If a large number of small diameter catalyst-containing tubes are used for temperature control, then temperature control effectiveness is improved, but capacity-specific cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidcapacity-specific cost
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functions are merged into the fin insert structure: heat conduction, structural support, and potential catalyst containment. This consolidation reduces the number of separate components needed, lowering manufacturing complexity and capacity-specific costs while maintaining effective temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fin inserts serve multiple purposes: they conduct heat away from the catalyst, provide structural support within the tube, and can be designed to work with different catalyst configurations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Temperature

If heat conducting fin inserts are used, then thermal management is improved, but material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal managementVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Heat conducting fin inserts are strategically placed only in regions where thermal management is most critical, rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the entire reactor. This localized approach improves thermal management effectiveness while minimizing overall material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fin inserts provide more than sufficient heat conduction capability in critical thermal zones, ensuring temperature control requirements are met with potentially less total material than a uniform distribution would require. The excessive local action compensates for reduced material in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized fin insert design enhances heat management in Fischer-Tropsch reactors, increasing productivity and reducing material usage, leading to more efficient and cost-effective production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels while preventing autothermal runaway.

Implementation Method 1

heat conducting fin inserts with an elongated center portion, a cross member extending outwardly from the center portion and an outer portion extending laterally from a distal end of the cross member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS20240318925A1Reactor fin insert design
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC
  • US20240318925A1 patent drawing
  • US20240318925A1 patent drawing
  • US20240318925A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A heat conducting insert for a reactor includes an elongated center portion, a cross member extending outwardly from the center portion and an outer portion extending laterally from a distal end of the cross member. A reactor includes a shell and an insert in the shell. The insert includes an elongated center portion, a cross member extending outwardly from the center portion, and an outer portion extending laterally from a distal end of the cross member.