Fischer Tropsch Heat Transfer Insert with Offset Thermocouple

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Fischer Tropsch reactor heat transfer inserts are impractical due to complex designs, inefficiently utilize catalysts, and struggle with temperature control, leading to suboptimal production of liquid hydrocarbons and increased gaseous outputs.

Innovation Solution

A heat transfer insert with a fin structure that includes a central longitudinal void and offset thermocouple space, allowing for even temperature distribution and measurement across the catalyst bed, facilitating efficient heat transfer and catalyst utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If complex fin structures with curved designs are used for heat transfer inserts, then heat transfer efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat transfer insert is divided into multiple discrete fin elements that can be individually manufactured and then assembled together. This segmentation allows each fin to be a simple extruded shape that is easy to manufacture, while the collective arrangement of multiple fins achieves the desired heat transfer surface area and efficiency without requiring complex curved geometries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple simple fin structures are combined to create the overall heat transfer insert. Instead of using a single complex curved fin design, several straightforward extruded fins are positioned and connected to achieve the same heat transfer function, thereby simplifying manufacturing while maintaining thermal performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If thermocouple is positioned on the central longitudinal axis of the insert, then manufacturing is simplified with symmetrical cross sections, but temperature measurement accuracy of the catalyst bed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrusion simplicityVSAvoidtemperature measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The thermocouple positioning feature is deliberately placed asymmetrically relative to the central longitudinal axis of the insert. This asymmetric positioning allows the thermocouple to be located closer to the catalyst bed where accurate temperature measurement is critical, while the insert itself maintains symmetrical cross-sections for ease of extrusion manufacturing. The asymmetry is localized to the thermocouple access feature rather than the overall insert geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Stability of the object's composition

If catalyst zones are centrally located in the insert, then structural symmetry is maintained, but temperature control becomes difficult leading to runaway reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural symmetryVSAvoidtemperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst zones are strategically positioned in specific locations within the insert rather than being uniformly distributed or centrally concentrated. By placing catalyst zones in regions where heat can be effectively managed and distributed, the design achieves better temperature control and prevents hot spots that could lead to runaway reactions, while the overall insert structure maintains symmetry for manufacturing purposes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the production of liquid hydrocarbons by maintaining consistent catalyst bed temperatures, preventing catalyst damage, and optimizing product distribution, thereby improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the Fischer Tropsch process.

Implementation Method 1

The plurality of fins are configured to transfer heat from an interior of the fin structure to an exterior of the fin structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

The fin structure defines a plurality of catalytic reaction zones along a length of the fin structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

The reactions that occur in FT reactors are often catalyst-based and are highly exothermic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 4

The FT process is typically a surface catalyzed carbon polymerization process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20250099939A1Fischer tropsch reactor with novel heat transfer mechanism and methods of syngas reforming
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 OXEON ENERGY LLC
  • US20250099939A1 patent drawing
  • US20250099939A1 patent drawing
  • US20250099939A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A heat transfer insert configured to fin within FT reactor is disclosed. The insert includes a fin structure that defines a longitudinal void along a longitudinal central axis of the fin structure or insert. The fin structure defines a plurality of catalytic reaction zones and a space configured to receive a thermocouple. The central longitudinal axis of the insert, which is also the centerline of the longitudinal void, is not colinear with the longitudinal axis of the thermocouple space. An FT reactor may include the heat transfer insert and an FT system may include one or more FT reactors. Configurations herein allow for catalytic reaction temperatures to be measured within the reactor at a place other than the centerline of the FT reactor.