Fischer-Tropsch Wax Hydrogenation and De-oiling Sequence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Paraffinic waxes derived from Fischer-Tropsch hydrocarbon synthesis are difficult to de-oil efficiently to achieve low oil content and desirable color properties, requiring multiple de-oiling stages and increasing capital costs.

Innovation Solution

Reversing the traditional processing sequence by first hydrogenating the wax and then de-oiling, using fractional crystallization at temperatures below 80°C, and employing a catalyst like NiSat 310 to convert oxygenated components into removable hydrocarbons, thereby reducing oil content to less than 0.5 weight % MEK-solubility and achieving desired color stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional de-oiling sequence is used first, then oil components are removed by solvent extraction, but subsequent hydrogenation is required as a final polishing step to achieve color specification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor specificationVSAvoidprocessing sequence
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional processing sequence by performing hydrogenation first to convert oxygenated components (aldehydes, ketones) into hydrocarbons, then performing de-oiling to remove the converted components along with other oil components in a single step. This reversal eliminates the need for a subsequent hydrogenation polishing step while achieving the same color specification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary hydrogenation action before de-oiling to convert oxygenated components that would otherwise require a final polishing hydrogenation step. By performing this conversion in advance, the process consolidates all necessary treatments into one sequence, simplifying the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple de-oiling stages are used to achieve low oil content, then oil content specification is met, but capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil content specificationVSAvoidcapital costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the wax by performing hydrogenation first, converting oxygenated components into hydrocarbons that have different solubility characteristics. This parameter change allows all oil components to be removed more efficiently in a single de-oiling stage, reducing the number of stages required and lowering capital costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If oxygenated components are present in the wax, then the wax can be processed with simpler initial treatment, but the wax develops undesirable color properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial treatment simplicityVSAvoidcolor deterioration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful oxygenated components (aldehydes, ketones) into beneficial hydrocarbons through preliminary hydrogenation. This conversion transforms substances that would cause color deterioration into components that can be easily removed during the subsequent de-oiling step, eliminating the color problem while simplifying the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the number of de-oiling stages required, improving efficiency and meeting product specifications with lower capital costs, while ensuring color stability and low oil content in the wax product.

Implementation Method 1

hydrogenating the wax first, followed by de-oiling thereof. Although not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that certain waxes contain particular molecule species, e.g. oxygenates, in concentrations which are extremely difficult to de-oil. If however the wax is first hydrogenated these molecule species are converted to hydrocarbons which are readily removed by de-oiling.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 2

employing a catalyst like NiSat 310 to convert oxygenated components into removable hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

then de-oiling, using fractional crystallization at temperatures below 80°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallisation: Crystallisation

Data Source

PatentEP2879767B1Treatment of wax
Publication Date: 2018.07.18 SASOL TECHNOLOGY (PTY) LTD
  • EP2879767B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A method of treating or refining a wax includes hydrogenating a feed wax which has an MEK-solubility oils content of more 0.5 weight % to provide a hydrogenated wax. Thereafter the hydrogenated wax is de-oiled to reduce the MEK-solubility oils content of the hydrogenated wax, producing a refined wax or a wax product.