Wireless FTM Parameter Negotiation for Dense WLANs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems lack an effective mechanism for devices to coordinate and ensure successful communication by determining optimal communication parameters, leading to inefficiencies and reduced throughput, especially in dense deployments where propagation delays and interference are significant.

Innovation Solution

A novel physical layer (PHY) parameter control and negotiation process that allows devices to quickly determine and agree on communication parameters through fine timing measurement (FTM) frame exchanges, using FTM request and response frames to confirm or override preferred parameters, ensuring optimal communication settings for successful data transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If devices transmit data without coordinating communication parameters, then transmission can occur immediately, but communication reliability deteriorates due to parameter mismatches between devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidtime for parameter coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by establishing a parameter coordination mechanism before actual data transmission. Devices exchange capability information and negotiate communication parameters (modulation schemes, coding rates, MIMO configurations) in advance through control messages. This preliminary parameter alignment ensures that when transmission occurs, both devices are configured correctly, eliminating retransmissions due to parameter mismatches and thereby improving communication reliability without significant time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If retransmissions are performed to handle parameter mismatches, then communication reliability is maintained, but productivity decreases due to repeated transmissions consuming channel capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidchannel throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by having receiving devices send capability information and parameter acknowledgments back to transmitting devices. When a device receives a transmission, it feeds back its processing capabilities and confirms the parameters used. This feedback loop allows the transmitting device to verify correct parameter interpretation and adjust if necessary, ensuring reliable communication while minimizing retransmissions. The feedback mechanism enables single-pass successful transmissions, thereby maintaining high channel throughput and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If devices use fixed communication parameters, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates when facing varying channel conditions and device capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adaptabilityVSAvoidparameter negotiation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by enabling devices to dynamically negotiate and adjust communication parameters based on their capabilities and channel conditions. Instead of fixed parameters, devices exchange capability information indicating supported modulation schemes (e.g., BPSK, QPSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM), coding rates, and MIMO configurations. The transmitting device selects optimal parameters from the receiving device's capability set, allowing the system to adapt to varying conditions. This parameter flexibility improves adaptability while the structured negotiation process keeps device complexity manageable through standardized capability exchange formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9591493B2Wireless communication fine timing measurement PHY parameter control and negotiation
Publication Date: 2017.03.07 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US9591493B2 patent drawing
  • US9591493B2 patent drawing
  • US9591493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication device (e.g., operative within a wireless local area network (WLAN)) coordinates with another wireless communication device to determine which communication parameter(s) to use in at least one FTM frame exchange. In an example of operation, the wireless communication device includes a communication interface and a processor such that the processor receives, via the communication interface, a fine timing measurement (FTM) request frame from the other wireless communication device. The FTM request frame specifies at least one preferred communication parameter for the at least one FTM frame exchange. The processor then determines, based on the FTM request frame, information related to the at least one preferred communication parameter. The wireless communication device generates and transmits a response to the FTM request frame to the other wireless communication device that confirms or overrides the at least one preferred communication parameter.