Fuel Accumulator Malfunction Detection via Reference Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fuel system diagnostics for internal-combustion engines are inefficient and unreliable during practical operation, requiring active interventions and limited to idling mode, which impairs accuracy and prevents predictive maintenance.

Innovation Solution

An evaluation unit that monitors pressure data in the fuel accumulator using a reference model to detect malfunctions by comparing actual and expected pressure changes, allowing for adaptive parameter adjustments and pattern recognition to identify defects in fuel pumps and injection nozzles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If active interventions are performed in the fuel system for diagnostics, then detection capability is improved, but the vehicle cannot be operated in practical conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidpractical operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel system performs self-diagnostics by monitoring its own pressure characteristics during normal operation. The evaluation unit continuously evaluates pressure data from the fuel accumulator without requiring external interventions, allowing the system to detect malfunctions autonomously while maintaining practical vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from pressure sensors to continuously monitor fuel system characteristics. The evaluation unit compares measured pressure values against expected values derived from a reference model, enabling real-time detection of deviations that indicate malfunctions while the vehicle operates normally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If diagnostics are limited to idling mode, then system stability is improved, but diagnostic accuracy and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoiddiagnostic accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system transitions from static idling-mode monitoring to dynamic monitoring that adapts to varying operating conditions. The reference model provides expected pressure characteristics for different operating states, enabling accurate diagnostics across diverse operational scenarios rather than limiting detection to stable idle conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If pressure data is monitored continuously during operation, then detection reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation unit serves multiple functions: it monitors pressure data, compares it against reference values, detects malfunctions, and can identify specific defective components. This multi-functionality is achieved through a single integrated evaluation unit that processes pressure information through a reference model, avoiding the need for separate diagnostic systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The reference model acts as an intermediary that translates complex fuel system behavior into comparable pressure expectations. By using the reference model as a mediator between actual pressure measurements and malfunction detection, the system achieves reliable diagnostics without requiring complex direct analysis of all system parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If malfunction detection is performed during practical operation, then productivity is improved, but diagnostic cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiddiagnostic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic function is merged with the existing fuel system control architecture. The evaluation unit integrates pressure monitoring and malfunction detection into the existing fuel management system, utilizing available pressure sensors and control units rather than requiring completely separate diagnostic hardware, thereby reducing overall complexity while enabling continuous operation during diagnostics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12116946B2Method and evaluation unit for detecting a malfunction of a fuel system of an internal-combustion engine
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US12116946B2 patent drawing
  • US12116946B2 patent drawing
  • US12116946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for a fuel system that makes a fuel available for an operation of an internal-combustion engine where the fuel system includes a fuel pump which conveys the fuel into a fuel accumulator and includes one or more injection nozzles which convey the fuel from the fuel accumulator to a working mixture of one or more cylinders of the internal-combustion engine includes an evaluation unit. The evaluation unit is configured to ascertain pressure data with respect to a physical pressure in the fuel accumulator during an operation of the fuel system at a sampling-time, ascertain a change in a reference pressure at the sampling-time with aid of a reference model of the fuel system, and detect a defect of the fuel system on a basis of the pressure data and on a basis of the change in the reference pressure.