Gas Turbine Fuel Additive Control System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine engines face challenges in dynamically controlling operational parameters such as exhaust gas emissions and engine performance, particularly under varying operational conditions, due to limitations in real-time adjustment of fuel additives.

Innovation Solution

A fuel additive control system that dynamically injects varying amounts of fuel additives, including alcohol, organic, and nano-metal additives, into the fuel line of a gas turbine engine based on real-time operational parameter monitoring, allowing for simultaneous control of exhaust gas emissions and engine performance optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If fuel additives are injected into the fuel line to control exhaust gas emissions and optimize engine performance, then emission reduction and performance improvement are achieved, but the system complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexhaust gas emissionsVSAvoidfuel additive control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors operational parameters such as engine speed, load, and temperature, and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the fuel additive injection rate. The controller compares actual emissions and performance parameters with target values and modifies additive delivery accordingly, enabling adaptive emission control and performance optimization without requiring overly complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If dynamic adjustment of fuel additive quantity is implemented based on real-time operational parameters, then engine performance and emission control are improved, but the measurement and control precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine performanceVSAvoidoperational parameter monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual measurement and control methods with electronic sensors and digital controllers that automatically monitor operational parameters and adjust fuel additive injection. This substitution enables precise real-time measurement of parameters such as engine speed, load, and temperature, and provides accurate control of additive delivery rates, thereby meeting high precision requirements without mechanical intervention errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of fuel additives are used to address different operational conditions, then adaptability and emission control effectiveness are enhanced, but the device complexity and operation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational condition adaptabilityVSAvoidfuel additive control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed to handle multiple types of fuel additives (such as cetane improvers, detergents, and emission-reducing additives) through a single integrated controller and injection mechanism. The system can selectively deliver different additive types or combinations based on operational conditions, providing universal adaptability across various engine loads, speeds, and environmental conditions while simplifying operation through automated control that eliminates the need for manual selection and management of multiple additive systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces exhaust gas species and improves engine performance by dynamically adjusting fuel additives in response to operational conditions, enhancing specific fuel consumption and maintaining optimal combustion characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

The control valve is positioned to supply a fuel additive to a fuel line containing fuel for supply to a combustion section of the gas turbine engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid mixing:

Implementation Method 2

Air compressed by the compressor is provided to the combustor where it is mixed with fuel that is burned

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

The turbine may include one or more stages with blades upon which the exhaust gases act to produce thrust. Thus, the turbine extracts energy from the flow of exhaust gases and converts the energy to work

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbine expansion: Turbine

Data Source

PatentUS11041446B2Gas turbine engine fuel additive control system
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 ROLLS ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11041446B2 patent drawing
  • US11041446B2 patent drawing
  • US11041446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas turbine engine fuel additive control system includes a sensor positioned to sense an operational parameter of a gas turbine engine that includes a compressor section, a combustion section, and a turbine section. The system also includes a control valve positioned to supply a fuel additive to a fuel line. The fuel line contains fuel for supply to the combustion section of the gas turbine engine to which the fuel additive is selectively added by injection into the fuel line. The system also includes a controller configured to monitor the operational parameter in real time during operation of the gas turbine engine and adjust the control valve to dynamically modulate an amount of the fuel additive being supplied in the fuel in accordance with operation of the gas turbine engine.