Fuel-Air Mixture Predictive Control to Reduce Actuator Wear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control methods for fuel-air mixtures in gas boilers cause excessive wear to actuators due to frequent and prolonged operation, necessitating regular maintenance and replacement.

Innovation Solution

A method employing model-predictive control using a Smith predictor, which identifies system behavior by determining the dead time and gain factor, allowing for less frequent and significant adjustments to the actuator, thereby reducing wear. This involves a two-phase process: an initial phase with a standard controller to establish baseline behavior and a second phase with a model-based controller that adapts based on the identified dead time and gain factor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a standard controller is used to maintain the differential pressure at the target value, then the pressure control is achieved, but the actuator is driven frequently and for long periods causing excessive wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator service lifeVSAvoidcontrol performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of dead time and gain factor in a first method phase before implementing model-predictive control. This preliminary characterization of system behavior enables the controller to anticipate actuator movements and plan adjustments optimally, reducing frequent and prolonged actuator operation while maintaining pressure control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adapts by using identified system parameters (dead time and gain factor) to optimize actuator operation. The controller adjusts the timing and magnitude of actuator commands based on the predicted system response, making the control strategy flexible and responsive to actual system behavior rather than using fixed control parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the actuator is driven frequently to maintain pressure within target range, then pressure control is maintained, but maintenance and replacement frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator durabilityVSAvoidpressure control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the differential pressure sensor combined with identified system dynamics (dead time and gain factor) to predict future pressure deviations. This allows the controller to make proactive adjustments rather than reactive corrections, reducing the frequency and duration of actuator operation while maintaining precise pressure control through informed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-identification of its own system parameters (dead time and gain factor) during normal operation. This self-characterization enables the controller to optimize its own control strategy without external intervention, automatically adapting to minimize actuator wear while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If model-predictive control with Smith predictor is implemented, then actuator wear is reduced, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator service lifeVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The Smith predictor acts as an intermediary computational element that separates the complex model-predictive control calculations from the actual actuator control. It uses the identified dead time and gain factor to generate predicted pressure responses, allowing the main controller to make simpler decisions based on these predictions rather than performing complex iterative optimizations in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240410580A1Method for model-predictive control of a fuel-air mixture of a system, and an associated system
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 EBM PAPST LANDSHUT GMBH
  • US20240410580A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a fuel-air mixture of a system with a manipulated variable for controlling an actuator (2) of the system in a first method phase for identification of the system behavior using a standard controller, in order to adjust the actual value on average to a target value. A profile of the actual value and a profile of the manipulated variable are recorded during the first method phase for identification of the system behavior, and from these the gain factor depending on the manipulated variable and the dead time are determined. After the determination of the dead time and the gain factor in a second method phase for model-predictive adaptive control of the system, the manipulated variable is determined using a model-based controller that has a Smith predictor and takes account of the gain factor and the dead time in order to adjust the actual value to the target value. Thus, in the second method phase, the manipulated variable has to be altered less frequently and less significantly by comparison with the first method phase.