Fuel Cell-Battery Power Split for EV Efficiency and Battery Life

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric vehicles powered by fuel cells and rechargeable batteries face inefficiencies in fuel usage and battery longevity, requiring complex power management systems and frequent refueling or recharging, which increases costs and downtime.

Innovation Solution

The system optimizes fuel cell and battery sizing to operate within peak efficiency ranges, using control algorithms to manage power distribution and state of charge, eliminating the need for frequent refueling and recharging by integrating hydrogen fuel cells and lithium-ion batteries sized for average and peak power requirements, respectively, with temperature and work cycle adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If fuel cells and batteries are sized to meet peak power requirements, then power availability is improved, but fuel efficiency deteriorates and refueling frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower availabilityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts fuel cell output based on real-time power demands and battery state of charge levels. The fuel cell operates in a dynamic range rather than at fixed peak capacity, optimizing its output to match actual vehicle needs while maintaining efficiency within 40-60% of maximum capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system changes operational parameters including fuel cell power output, battery charge/discharge rates, and state of charge thresholds based on vehicle conditions. This allows the system to adapt to varying power demands while keeping the fuel cell in its optimal efficiency range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If fuel cells are operated outside peak efficiency range to meet variable power demands, then power adaptability is improved, but fuel efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower adaptabilityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The battery system acts as an intermediary between the fuel cell and the power demand. It absorbs power fluctuations, providing supplemental power during high-demand periods and storing excess power during low-demand periods, allowing the fuel cell to operate steadily in its optimal efficiency range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The battery provides partial power during peak demands rather than requiring the fuel cell to fully meet all power needs. This partial action by the battery allows the fuel cell to maintain optimal operating conditions while still meeting overall vehicle power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Speed

If batteries are frequently charged and discharged to meet power demands, then power responsiveness is improved, but battery longevity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower responsivenessVSAvoidbattery longevity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors battery state of charge, temperature, and charge/discharge rates. Based on this feedback, it adjusts the charge/discharge operations to keep the battery within optimal parameters, preventing excessive stress that would reduce longevity while maintaining adequate power responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary charging of the battery during low-demand periods when the fuel cell is operating efficiently, preparing the battery for future high-demand periods. This preliminary action reduces the need for rapid charging during critical moments, extending battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of energy

If complex power management systems are implemented to optimize fuel cell and battery operation, then fuel efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidpower management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power management system operates autonomously using onboard sensors and controllers to monitor and adjust fuel cell and battery operations. The system self-regulates based on predefined efficiency criteria and real-time conditions, eliminating the need for external manual intervention while maintaining optimal fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances fuel efficiency by 25% and reduces refueling frequency, extends battery life by a factor of two, and eliminates the need for external recharging, thereby reducing costs and environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

one or more fuel cells that consume a gaseous fuel stored in one or more onboard fuel tanks to produce electric energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel cell: Fuel Cell

Implementation Method 2

rechargeable batteries that provide electric energy during a discharge mode and store electric energy during a charging mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBattery: Battery (electricity)

Data Source

PatentUS12583363B2Electric vehicle employing fuel cells and rechargeable batteries
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 WIGGINS ELEVATOR
  • US12583363B2 patent drawing
  • US12583363B2 patent drawing
  • US12583363B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric vehicle is described that has fuel cells and rechargeable batteries. The fuel cells are sized to produce an electric power output within their peak fuel efficiency range approximately equal to an anticipated average electric power requirement of the electric vehicle over a projected work cycle. The rechargeable batteries are sized to provide electric power up to the anticipated maximum power draw over the anticipated work cycle. An electrical vehicle controller operates the fuel cells within their highest fuel efficiency range during normal operations and maintains the battery state of charge in an optimal longevity range using a portion of the output of the fuel cells. The batteries are employed to handle short-term power requirements that exceed the output of the fuel cells.