Solid Polymer Fuel Cell Cooling Manifold Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fuel cells using solid polymer electrolytes face challenges in maintaining stable power generation and heat collection performance during output changes, leading to potential voltage instability and corrosion due to excessive cooling liquid flow and temperature fluctuations.

Innovation Solution

A fuel cell design with a constant flow channel cross-sectional area in the cooling liquid manifold and a longer flow channel length, combined with a folded-back or spiral flow channel configuration, to suppress corrosion currents and prevent drift of cooling liquid, ensuring stable voltage and reduced corrosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the cooling liquid flow channel cross-sectional area is increased to improve heat removal, then cooling efficiency is improved, but corrosion current increases and voltage instability occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat removal efficiencyVSAvoidvoltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the flow channel cross-sectional area to a specific range (0.5-5.0 cm²) and controlling the flow rate within 10-100 mL/min. This quantitative parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by finding the optimal balance point where sufficient heat removal is achieved while corrosion current and voltage instability are suppressed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If the cooling liquid flow rate is increased to improve cooling performance, then temperature control is improved, but corrosion of constituent members accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidcorrosion
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the cooling liquid flow rate within a specific parameter range (10-100 mL/min) to resolve the contradiction. This parameter optimization ensures adequate cooling performance while limiting the corrosion current that accelerates with higher flow rates, thereby preventing corrosion of fuel cell constituents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the flow channel cross-sectional area is decreased to suppress corrosion current, then corrosion is reduced, but heat removal efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion currentVSAvoidheat collection performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent determines an optimal flow channel cross-sectional area range (0.5-5.0 cm²) that balances two opposing requirements: suppressing corrosion current while maintaining adequate heat removal. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by identifying the threshold value where both objectives are simultaneously satisfied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the cooling liquid flow channel length is increased to suppress corrosion, then durability is improved, but pressure loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the flow channel length within specific constraints to resolve the contradiction between durability and pressure loss. By controlling the length to be sufficiently long for corrosion suppression while limiting excessive length that would cause prohibitive pressure losses, the parameter optimization achieves both durability improvement and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively stabilizes voltage during output changes, suppresses corrosion currents, and enhances durability by maintaining uniform cooling liquid flow and preventing condensation issues, resulting in improved power generation performance and long-term reliability.

Implementation Method 1

The fuel cell generates heat during operation, and thus it is necessary for the fuel cell to be cooled down with a cooling liquid so as to approximately maintain a temperature state of the fuel battery cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat removal through fluid flow: Convection

Implementation Method 2

a polymer electrolyte membrane that selectively conveys hydrogen ions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon selective conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

A fuel cell using a solid polymer electrolyte in the related art is a device that allows a fuel gas containing hydrogen and an oxidant gas such as air containing oxygen to electrochemically react with each other and generates power and heat at the same time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Fuel Cell

Data Source

PatentUS9373854B2Solid polymer fuel cell
Publication Date: 2016.06.21 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US9373854B2 patent drawing
  • US9373854B2 patent drawing
  • US9373854B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a solid polymer fuel cell, destabilization of a voltage when an output state is changed is suppressed, and flow of a corrosion current through a cooling liquid in a cooling liquid manifold is reduced. The fuel cell is constructed by laminating a plurality of fuel battery cells, each including an MEA, a pair of separators, a frame that surrounds the periphery of the MEA, an anode, and a cathode, and a cooling liquid manifold that is formed by the frame. A flow channel of the cooling liquid manifold has a constant flow channel cross-sectional area, and a flow channel length of the cooling liquid manifold, which is included in one of the fuel battery cells, along a flow channel direction is longer than the thickness of the one fuel battery cell in a stacked direction.