Fuel Cell Membrane Segmentation for Cost Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells have a significant portion of costly ion-conducting membrane material extending beyond the electrochemically active region, contributing to increased costs and reduced durability, and there is a need for a more cost-effective and durable membrane with improved performance.

Innovation Solution

A membrane design featuring a central ion-conducting region surrounded by a border region of non-ion-conducting material, with a single reinforcement extending throughout, and an optional overlap region where the non-ion-conducting material overlaps the ion-conducting material, enhancing mechanical properties and reducing unnecessary material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the ion-conducting membrane extends to the edge of the MEA with film layers for sealing, then the membrane provides adequate sealing and reinforcement, but a large area of costly ion-conducting material is wasted in non-electrochemically active regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing and reinforcementVSAvoidion-conducting membrane material
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane is segmented into two distinct functional zones: a central electrochemically active region containing ion-conducting membrane material, and a peripheral non-active region with reduced or no ion-conducting material. This segmentation allows the membrane to provide sealing and reinforcement functions in the peripheral region without wasting expensive ion-conducting material in areas where it is not electrochemically active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the membrane are assigned different material compositions and properties. The central region maintains full ion-conducting membrane material for electrochemical activity, while the peripheral region uses reduced material or alternative sealing structures. This local differentiation optimizes material usage by providing sealing functions only where needed, without extending expensive ion-conducting material into non-active zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If film layers are added around the edge region to seal and reinforce the membrane, then durability and sealing are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmembrane structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing and reinforcement functions are merged into the membrane structure itself through the selective extension of ion-conducting material into the peripheral region. Instead of adding separate film layers on top of the membrane, the membrane structure is designed to provide both electrochemical activity and sealing functions in an integrated manner, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ion-conducting membrane material in the peripheral region serves multiple functions: it provides sealing, reinforcement, and structural support. By making the membrane material itself multi-functional in the peripheral region, the need for additional separate sealing layers is eliminated, simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the ion-conducting membrane extends beyond the electrochemically active region by several centimetres, then adequate sealing is provided, but cost increases significantly due to material wastage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesealingVSAvoidion-conducting membrane material
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The ion-conducting membrane material is extracted or removed from the peripheral non-electrochemically active region, leaving only the central active region with full material coverage. This extraction eliminates the waste of expensive material in areas where it does not contribute to electrochemical performance, while alternative sealing structures provide the necessary sealing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The design discards the conventional practice of extending ion-conducting membrane material into non-active peripheral regions. By discarding this material wastage and using alternative sealing approaches, the invention recovers significant cost savings while maintaining adequate sealing through optimized material placement in the central active region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentEP2601701B1Membrane structure
Publication Date: 2018.04.04 JOHNSON MATTHEY FUEL CELLS LTD
  • EP2601701B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2d
  • EP2601701B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP2601701B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

A membrane, suitable for use in a fuel cell, wherein the membrane comprises: (a) a central region comprising an ion-conducting polymeric material; (b) a border region which creates a frame around the central region and which consists of one or more non-ion-conducting materials wherein at least one of the one or more non-ion-conducting materials forms a layer; wherein the non- ion-conducting material of the border region overlaps the ion- conducting polymeric material of the central region by 0 to 10mm in an overlap region, is disclosed.