Fuel Cell Purge Circuit with Pressure Sensor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fuel cell purging devices are inefficient, unreliable, and complex due to the need for manual synchronization of valves, leading to suboptimal pressure differential and increased manufacturing costs, which degrades the performance and autonomy of hydrogen electrochemical cells by allowing excess moisture and inert gases in the anodic compartment.

Innovation Solution

A purging circuit with a recovery gas tank, nonreturn valves, and pressure sensors that homogenize hydrogen and inert gases, controlling gas flow based on pressure data to prevent hydrogen release into the environment and maintain optimal compartment pressure, thereby avoiding hydrogen/neutral gas stratification and mechanical degradation of the membrane.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual synchronization of valves is used in existing purging devices, then the device structure is simpler, but the reliability and performance are degraded due to suboptimal pressure differential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurging reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The purging device automatically controls valve opening and closing based on pressure differential measurements, eliminating the need for manual synchronization. The system self-regulates the purging process by using the pressure sensor to detect when the anodic compartment needs purging and automatically actuates the valves at the optimal moment, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex manual coordination mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a pressure sensor that continuously monitors the pressure differential across the membrane and provides feedback to the control mechanism. This feedback loop enables the system to detect when inert gas accumulation occurs and automatically triggers the purging sequence at the precise moment when the pressure differential is optimal, ensuring reliable purging while maintaining simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If existing purging devices are used, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but performance and autonomy are degraded due to excess moisture and inert gases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel cell autonomyVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces complex mechanical synchronization mechanisms with an electronic sensing and control system. The pressure sensor and automated valve control eliminate the need for precision-machined mechanical linkages and synchronous actuation mechanisms, thereby maintaining ease of manufacture while significantly improving purging effectiveness and fuel cell autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the purging timing based on the measured pressure differential parameter. By monitoring the pressure difference across the membrane and triggering purging at the optimal pressure point, the system maximizes the removal of inert gases and moisture, thereby extending fuel cell autonomy without requiring complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If purging is performed frequently to remove moisture and inert gases, then cell performance is improved, but hydrogen consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell performanceVSAvoidhydrogen consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs purging periodically based on actual need rather than continuously or at fixed intervals. The pressure sensor detects when inert gas accumulation reaches a threshold that would degrade performance, and triggers a purging cycle only at that moment. This on-demand periodic purging maintains optimal cell performance while minimizing unnecessary hydrogen consumption associated with frequent purging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The rapid automated valve actuation enables the purging process to occur quickly once triggered, rushing through the purging action in a short time frame. This minimizes the duration of hydrogen flow during purging, thereby reducing hydrogen consumption while still achieving effective removal of moisture and inert gases to maintain cell performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Productivity

If pressure differential is increased to improve purging efficiency, then inert gas removal is enhanced, but risk of mechanical degradation of membrane increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurging efficiencyVSAvoidmembrane degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure sensor continuously monitors the pressure differential before purging is initiated, identifying the precise moment when the pressure difference is optimal for purging. By triggering the purging sequence at this pre-determined optimal point, the system ensures sufficient pressure differential to efficiently remove inert gases while avoiding excessive pressure that would cause membrane degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the purging timing based on real-time pressure measurements rather than using a fixed pressure differential. The valve actuation is triggered when the pressure sensor detects the optimal pressure point, creating a dynamic adaptability that allows the system to maximize purging efficiency while automatically preventing harmful pressure levels that would degrade the membrane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient, reliable, and simplified purging of the anodic compartment, reducing hydrogen consumption, minimizing inert gas buildup, and extending fuel cell autonomy by ensuring homogeneous gas mixing and controlled pressure management, thus enhancing the overall performance and longevity of the fuel cell.

Implementation Method 1

a first nonreturn valve connected to the first outlet of the means for containing a recovery gas so as to prevent a gas from being introduced into these means through the first outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOne-way valve mechanism: Valve

Implementation Method 2

a second nonreturn valve connected to the first inlet of the means for containing a recovery gas, so as to prevent a gas from being discharged through the first inlet, from these means

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOne-way valve mechanism: Valve

Implementation Method 3

a pressure sensor able to measure the pressure of a fluid present in said circuit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 4

A purging circuit with a recovery gas tank, nonreturn valves, and pressure sensors that homogenize hydrogen and inert gases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas mixing and homogenization:

Data Source

PatentUS11239477B2Purge circuit of a fuel cell
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 ASSOCIATION POUR LA RECHERCHE ET LE DEVELOPPEMENT DES METHODES ET PROCESSUS INDUSTRIELS (ARMINES)
  • US11239477B2 patent drawing
  • US11239477B2 patent drawing
  • US11239477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A purging circuit for purging an anodic compartment of a cell of a fuel cell, this circuit including: a capacity, forming a related volume at least equal to 500 ml, for containing and homogenising a recovery gas, including an inlet and an outlet; a first nonreturn valve to prevent the recovery gas from returning through the outlet and allowing gas to flow from the first outlet to an inlet of the compartment; a second nonreturn valve to prevent gas from being discharged from the capacity through the inlet; a pressure sensor able to measure the pressure of a fluid present in the circuit; a valve controlling the flow of a supply gas to and from the compartment as a function of data of the sensor and allowing gas to flow from the first nonreturn valve to the inlet of the compartment.