Fuel Cell Separator Asymmetry for Compact Stack Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fuel cell designs result in wasted space due to staggered arrangements of electrode units and catalyst deposits, leading to reduced productivity and economic inefficiency, as they require two different types of electrode units and non-power generation areas between separators.

Innovation Solution

A fuel cell design where power generation units consist of stacked electrolyte electrode assemblies with different reactant gas flow grooves on each separator, allowing efficient gas flow and catalyst deposition on the same areas, eliminating non-power generation spaces and enabling the use of a single type of electrolyte electrode assembly, thereby reducing the overall size and production costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If skip cooling is implemented with coolant flow fields provided at intervals, then the number of coolant flow fields is reduced and overall size is decreased, but non-power-generation areas are formed between separators resulting in wasted space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall size of fuel cell stackVSAvoidpower generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by making the number of flow grooves in first and second reactant gas flow fields different from the number of flow grooves in third and fourth reactant gas flow fields. This asymmetric design allows the power generation areas to be positioned such that they overlap or align with coolant flow fields, eliminating non-power-generation areas while maintaining skip cooling configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If two different types of electrode units are used to accommodate staggered catalyst deposits, then power generation areas can be defined, but productivity decreases and economic efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generation area definitionVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a standardized electrode unit that can serve multiple positions in the stack. By making the power generation areas in first and second electrolyte electrode assemblies coincide with each other, the same electrode unit design can be used throughout the stack, eliminating the need for two different types of electrode units and simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the spatial parameters of flow grooves rather than the electrode unit parameters themselves. By adjusting the number and positioning of flow grooves in different separators, the power generation areas are realigned to coincide, allowing standard electrode units to be used in all positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the number of flow grooves is made identical in all reactant gas flow fields, then manufacturing is simplified, but non-power-generation areas are formed reducing effective catalyst utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoideffective power generation area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the flow groove configurations location-specific. The number of flow grooves varies in different reactant gas flow fields (first and second versus third and fourth) to locally adjust the positioning of power generation areas, ensuring they coincide with coolant flow fields and eliminate wasted space, while maintaining high manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves efficient power generation by eliminating wasted space and allowing the use of a single electrolyte electrode assembly type, resulting in improved productivity and economic efficiency by optimizing gas flow and catalyst deposition across the fuel cell.

Implementation Method 1

The solid polymer electrolyte membrane is a polymer ion exchange membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon exchange: Ion Exchange

Implementation Method 2

an anode and a cathode each including an electrode catalyst layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS7695845B2Fuel cell
Publication Date: 2010.04.13 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US7695845B2 patent drawing
  • US7695845B2 patent drawing
  • US7695845B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Each of power generation units of a fuel cell according to the present invention is formed by stacking a first metal separator, a first membrane electrode assembly, a second metal separator, a second membrane electrode assembly, and a third metal separator together. The power generation unit has therein a first oxygen-containing gas flow field, a first fuel gas flow field, a second oxygen-containing gas flow field, and a second fuel gas flow field. The number of flow grooves in the first oxygen-containing gas flow field is different from that of flow grooves in the second oxygen-containing gas flow field, and the number of flow grooves in the first fuel gas flow field is different from that of flow grooves in the second fuel gas flow field.