Fuel Cell Shutdown Warming for Subzero Startup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for shutting down and storing fuel cell systems face challenges in subzero temperatures, particularly in rapidly starting up from below freezing conditions due to ice formation and water management issues, and there is a need for improved methods to address these problems effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves monitoring the fuel cell stack temperature and performing initial and predetermined warming operations to maintain optimal hydration states, with different approaches for initial and final warming operations, including varying target temperatures, reactant flow rates, and pressures, to ensure efficient startup without additional purging steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the fuel cell system uses a normal shut-down procedure without purging, then energy is conserved and the system remains hydrated, but ice forms in the flow channels during subzero storage which causes startup problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidstartup reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary assessment of storage conditions (temperature, duration, location) before shut-down and takes preventive action by selecting appropriate warming strategies. This preliminary action prevents ice formation before it occurs, ensuring reliable startup without requiring energy-intensive purging operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel cell stack serves itself by using its own residual heat and internal thermal mass to maintain temperature during storage. The system leverages the stack's own thermal properties and stored energy to prevent freezing, eliminating the need for external heating or purging systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the system performs a purge shut-down to remove water from flow channels, then ice formation is prevented, but additional time and energy are consumed and hydration state is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice formationVSAvoidshut-down time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors storage conditions (temperature, humidity, duration) and adjusts the shut-down strategy accordingly. Based on feedback from environmental sensors and storage duration predictions, the system dynamically selects between warming strategies or normal shut-down, optimizing both ice prevention and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (temperature maintenance level, reactant flow rate, pressure) based on predicted storage conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system prevents ice formation without requiring complete purging, thus reducing shut-down time while still protecting against freezing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the fuel cell stack is kept at optimal operating temperature during storage, then startup reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of maintaining full operating temperature, the system applies partial warming only when necessary based on storage conditions. The warming level is optimized to be just sufficient to prevent ice formation and ensure reliable startup, avoiding excessive energy consumption while maintaining adequate performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies intermittent warming cycles rather than continuous heating. Based on predicted storage duration and temperature conditions, the system periodically activates warming and then allows the stack to coast on residual heat, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If the system uses repeated warming operations during storage, then hydration state is maintained, but the last warming operation may leave the stack in an undesirable hydration state for startup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidhydration state
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary assessment of storage conditions and predicts the optimal warming strategy before implementation. By anticipating the final storage state, the system adjusts the last warming operation to achieve the desired hydration level for startup, rather than applying uniform warming throughout the entire storage period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The warming strategy is dynamically adjusted based on real-time conditions and predicted storage duration. The system transitions from frequent warming operations during early storage to reduced or modified warming in later stages, optimizing both hydration maintenance and startup readiness throughout the storage period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable startup from subzero temperatures without the need for additional purging steps, efficiently managing hydration states and conserving energy, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of fuel cell system operation.

Implementation Method 1

Fuel cells such as solid polymer electrolyte fuel cells electrochemically convert reactants, namely fuel (such as hydrogen) and oxidant (such as oxygen or air), to generate electric power. Along with water, heat is a significant by-product from the electrochemical reactions taking place within a fuel cell.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reactions: Fuel Cell

Implementation Method 2

Stacks designed to achieve high power density (e.g. automotive stacks) typically circulate liquid coolant throughout the stack in order to remove heat quickly and efficiently.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

performing initial and predetermined warming operations to maintain optimal hydration states

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3350859B1Shutdown and storage method for fuel cell system at below freezing temperatures
Publication Date: 2020.10.28 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP3350859B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3350859B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3a
  • EP3350859B1 patent drawingFigure 3b~3c

AI summary

Improved methods are disclosed for shutting down and storing a fuel cell system, particularly for below freezing temperature conditions. The methods comprise stopping power production from the fuel cell stack, monitoring its temperature, and repeatedly performing a predetermined warming operation if the stack temperature falls to a normal threshold temperature. In the improved methods, either an initial threshold temperature and/or an initial warming operation are used that differ from the respective normal threshold temperature and the predetermined warming operation.