Fuel Cell Stack Voltage Sensor Diagnostic System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydrogen fuel cell stack voltage sensor systems are cost-intensive due to the high number of sensors required, leading to potential sensor drift or failure going unrecognized, especially when readings fall within normal electrochemical ranges, and there is no effective method to identify faulty sensors within these ranges.

Innovation Solution

A multi-level rationality testing system that evaluates fuel cell stack voltage sensor output by determining if maximum and minimum values are within sensor limits, conducting power mode observations, and performing enhanced reactant concentration tests to differentiate between sensor errors and actual fuel cell issues, using a reduced number of sensors while ensuring accurate diagnostics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the number of voltage sensors is reduced to lower cost, then the quantity of sensors decreases, but the ability to detect sensor drift or failure deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of voltage sensorsVSAvoidsensor fault detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple voltage sensor readings into a single stack voltage measurement, merging the function of multiple sensors into one. This allows cost reduction by using fewer physical sensors while maintaining monitoring capability through mathematical combination of available readings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensor readings are continuously monitored against expected ranges and relationships. The system provides feedback on sensor health by comparing actual readings with predicted values, enabling detection of drift or failure even with reduced sensor quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If fewer voltage sensors are used, then cost is reduced, but measurement precision and fault identification capability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system costVSAvoidvoltage measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary rationality tests on sensor readings before final evaluation. By pre-screening readings for consistency and合理性, the system ensures measurement precision is maintained even with fewer sensors, as problematic readings are identified and handled before affecting final measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If sensor readings are interpreted as electrochemical phenomena, then normal operation is assumed, but faulty sensors go unrecognized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidsensor fault information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by implementing rationality tests that preemptively identify and flag potentially faulty readings before they are misinterpreted as normal electrochemical phenomena. This prevents loss of fault information by catching anomalies early in the analysis chain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of rationality testing between raw sensor readings and final interpretation. This intermediary process mediates between the sensor output and electrochemical interpretation, preventing direct misinterpretation of faulty readings as normal phenomena.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If no method is implemented to identify faulty sensors within normal ranges, then system complexity remains low, but diagnostic capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic system complexityVSAvoidfaulty sensor detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the diagnostic process into distinct levels: first-level rationality tests for basic consistency, second-level tests for relationship validation, and third-level tests for advanced fault detection. This segmentation makes the diagnostic system manageable while progressively improving detection capability without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by applying different levels of diagnostic testing selectively. Not all sensors require all levels of testing at all times, allowing the system to maintain low complexity during normal operation while enabling comprehensive diagnostic capability when needed, thus detecting faulty sensors without constant high complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10634727B2Fuel cell stack cell voltage sensor diagnostic
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10634727B2 patent drawing
  • US10634727B2 patent drawing
  • US10634727B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for evaluating voltage sensor output using a diagnostic system includes: measuring an overall fuel cell stack voltage using a stack voltage sensor; identifying a fuel cell voltage of a first end cell using a first end cell voltage sensor and a second end cell using a second end cell voltage sensor; determining if a maximum value of the overall fuel cell stack voltage, the fuel cell voltage of the first end cell or the second end cell is less than a sensor limit, and if a minimum value of the fuel cell voltages is greater than the sensor limit; performing a test to identify if the maximum value is greater than an average sensor signal value and if the average sensor signal value is greater than the minimum value; and conducting a test to identify if the minimum value is less than a first predetermined threshold.