Fuel Tank Product ID Sensing for Cross-Contamination Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for loading and unloading fuel products into distribution tanks lack effective mechanisms to prevent cross-contamination of different liquid fuels, leading to costly mistakes due to the reliance on human operators for segregation.

Innovation Solution

A crossover protection system mounted on product transport vehicles, incorporating a system controller, fluid property sensors, valves, and tank tag readers to automatically prevent the mixing of dissimilar liquid products by verifying the type of fuel through sensors and tags, ensuring only matching fuels are loaded or unloaded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual operator monitoring is used to prevent cross-contamination, then operational flexibility is maintained, but reliability of preventing mixing is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of cross-contaminationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-verification by reading product IDs from both the transport vehicle and distribution tank, automatically comparing them, and controlling valve operation without requiring manual operator intervention for verification, thereby improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring product ID matches between source and destination tanks and using this information to automatically control valve states, ensuring that valves only open when product types match, thus reliably preventing cross-contamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated sensor verification is implemented, then reliability of preventing cross-contamination is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of cross-contaminationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multi-functional components where fluid property sensors serve both product identification and verification functions, and the controller integrates multiple tasks including reading product IDs, comparing them, controlling valves, and providing user feedback, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a controller as an intermediary that mediates between the sensors, valves, and user interface, centralizing the complex logic of product verification and valve control in a single component, which manages system complexity while ensuring reliable cross-contamination prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If product verification is performed before transfer, then cross-contamination is prevented, but productivity is reduced due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of cross-contaminationVSAvoidloading and unloading speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs product verification in advance by reading and storing product IDs from both the transport vehicle and distribution tank before initiating any product transfer, and only allows transfer operations when verification confirms matching product types, thereby preventing cross-contamination while enabling efficient approved transfers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous operational capability by quickly performing automated verification and immediately enabling product transfer when matches are confirmed, minimizing idle time and ensuring that verified product transfers can proceed without interruption, thus balancing reliability with productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Measurement precision

If manual verification methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision of product identification is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct identification accuracyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual visual verification and manual record-keeping with automated electronic product ID sensors and digital comparison logic, dramatically improving product identification accuracy by eliminating human error while the controller manages complexity to maintain ease of operation through automatic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3514108B1Cross contamination control systems with fluid product id sensors
Publication Date: 2022.11.02 KNAPPCO CORP
  • EP3514108B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3514108B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3514108B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A crossover protection system including a product transport vehicle (15) having a tank compartment (25) for containing a liquid product, a fluid property sensor (130) positioned to contact liquid product stored in the tank compartment (25), a system controller (70), and a valve (45) coupled to the tank compartment (25). The valve (45) regulates a flow of liquid product from the tank compartment (25) and has a normally locked state. The system controller (701) may compare a received transported liquid type signal from the fuel property sensor (130) indicative of the type of liquid product in the tank compartment (25) and compare the type of liquid product to a stored liquid product type. If the two types match, the crossover protection controller (70) transitions the valve (45) to an unlocked state to allow the liquid product to unload from the tank compartment (25). If the two types do not match, the crossover protection controller will disable the valve (45) from transitioning to the unlocked state.