Fuel Injection Delay Control for Variable Displacement Engines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Variable displacement engines face challenges in accurately determining fuel injection delay due to cylinder deactivation, leading to air-fuel ratio oscillations and reduced engine efficiency, as existing methods rely on a single delay value that is no longer appropriate with varying cylinder activation patterns.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates fuel injection delay using a weighted average of past and present engine cycles, incorporating a base delay time and extra delay time based on expected cylinder deactivation patterns, allowing for improved estimation and control regardless of known future cylinder firing patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single fuel injection delay value is used for all engine cycles, then the control system is simple, but air-fuel ratio oscillations occur due to cylinder deactivation patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidair-fuel ratio stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection delay value is made dynamic by calculating it as a weighted average between a base delay value and an extra delay value. The extra delay value is determined based on the current cylinder deactivation pattern, allowing the delay compensation to adapt to varying engine operating conditions while maintaining a relatively simple control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If the control gain is increased to reduce error quickly, then response time improves, but air-fuel ratio oscillations are induced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidair-fuel ratio stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The controller calculates the fuel injection delay compensation value in advance based on the expected cylinder deactivation pattern before the actual fuel injection occurs. By determining the appropriate delay compensation beforehand, the controller can apply higher gains for faster error correction without inducing oscillations, as the timing of fuel injection is already optimized for the current operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If fuel injection timing is adjusted to compensate for delay, then air-fuel ratio control accuracy improves, but complexity increases due to varying cylinder patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair-fuel ratio control accuracyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection delay compensation is segmented into two distinct components: a base delay value that applies to all engine cycles, and an extra delay value that is specific to the current cylinder deactivation pattern. This segmentation allows the control algorithm to maintain accuracy by accounting for pattern-specific variations while keeping the overall structure manageable through modular calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11708800B2System and method for controlling fuel supplied to an engine
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11708800B2 patent drawing
  • US11708800B2 patent drawing
  • US11708800B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining fuel delay in a fuel injected engine with cylinders that may be deactivated are presented. In one example, the fuel injection delay is determined via a cylinder firing schedule array when the cylinder firing schedule array is available. The fuel injection delay is determined via weighted average of a fuel injection delay of a present engine cycle and a fuel injection delay of a past engine cycle when the cylinder firing schedule array is not available.