Fuel Injection Flow Fuse for Common Rail Control Valve Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing common rail fuel injection systems face challenges in controlling fuel injection at low engine loads, leading to excessive fuel injection and emissions, particularly due to issues with the control valve failing to close, causing continuous fuel flow and high cylinder pressure.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a flow fuse positioned between the first needle control volume and the first control valve, which includes a cylindrical cavity with a cup-shaped piston and restricted flow passages, ensures that the pressure in the needle control volume is raised only when the control valve is closed, preventing continuous fuel injection by blocking the flow connection in abnormal conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a control valve is used to control fuel injection timing and duration, then injection precision is improved, but the risk of control valve failure causing continuous fuel flow increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection timing and duration controlVSAvoidcontrol valve failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A flow fuse is introduced as an intermediary safety device between the control valve and the needle control volume. This flow fuse monitors the pressure differential across the control valve and automatically blocks the fuel supply to the needle control volume when abnormal pressure conditions indicate control valve failure, preventing continuous fuel injection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow fuse implements a pressure-based feedback mechanism that continuously monitors the pressure differential across the control valve. When the pressure differential exceeds predetermined thresholds indicating control valve failure, the feedback triggers the flow fuse to block fuel flow, automatically correcting the abnormal condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the needle control volume pressure is increased to improve injection control, then injection precision is improved, but the risk of excessive fuel injection upon control valve failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection controlVSAvoidexcessive fuel injection and emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow fuse is pre-configured with pressure differential thresholds that trigger automatic fuel flow blocking before excessive fuel injection can occur. By establishing predetermined pressure limits and automatic blocking mechanisms in advance, the system prevents harmful effects before they manifest

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If a flow fuse is added to prevent control valve failure effects, then system safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidfuel injection unit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow fuse is designed as a separate, extractable safety module that can be independently removed or replaced. This modular approach isolates the safety function from the main injection mechanism, allowing the flow fuse to be serviced or replaced without affecting the core injection system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents excessive fuel injection, reduces emissions, and minimizes energy consumption by ensuring precise control over fuel pressure and flow, addressing the issue of control valve failure and improving overall system safety.

Implementation Method 1

The needle control volume and the needle cavity are arranged in flow communication with each other via one or mode well dimensioned openings or flow channels that restrict the flow between the two cavities, i.e. restrict the speed the pressure is able to raise in the needle control volume.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRestricted flow:

Implementation Method 2

The flow fuse includes a cup-shaped piston arranged in the cylindrical cavity such that the piston blocks a flow connection from the needle control volume to the control valve when a pressure differential across the piston exceeds a predetermined threshold value.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential blocking:

Data Source

PatentEP3265668B1A fuel injection unit for an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2018.12.19 WARTSILA FINLAND OY
  • EP3265668B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3265668B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The present invention discusses a novel fuel injection unit for a large internal combustion engine having a common rail fuel system. The fuel injection unit (10) of the present invention is connected to the common rail fuel system, the fuel injection unit (10) comprising a first nozzle (22) and a second nozzle (24), the first nozzle (22) having a first needle control volume (34) connected by means of a flow passage (48) with a first control valve (16), the first nozzle (22) and the second nozzle (24) having a common needle cavity (30), wherein a flow fuse(50) arranged in connection with the flow passage (48) connecting the first needle control volume (34) to the first control valve (16).