Fuel Injection Valve Movable Core Gap Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fuel injection valves face challenges in maintaining consistent valve opening response and injection amount due to variations in flow resistance and moving speed, especially with increasing fuel pressures, which require a large valve opening force and can lead to variations in the time period for valve opening and closing operations.

Innovation Solution

The fuel injection valve design incorporates a movable core with a cylindrical shape and a holder chamber filled with fuel, featuring a press-fit and non-press-fit region with specific gap configurations to minimize flow resistance variations, allowing for reduced variation in moving speed and valve opening response, and includes a stopper member to restrict movement away from the nozzle hole.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If fuel pressure is increased to improve injection performance, then injection pressure is improved, but valve closing force increases requiring larger valve opening force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection pressureVSAvoidvalve opening force
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The movable core is divided into two separate cores: an inner core and an outer core. These two cores move independently within the holder, allowing the inner core to be optimized for magnetic attraction response while the outer core is optimized for minimizing flow resistance. This segmentation enables each core to perform its specific function efficiently without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The outer core is designed with different gap configurations at different locations: a first gap configuration near the nozzle hole and a second gap configuration away from the nozzle hole. This local quality variation allows the outer core to minimize flow resistance in critical areas while maintaining structural integrity and magnetic circuit efficiency in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If gap between holder and movable core is reduced to improve response speed, then valve opening response is improved, but flow resistance variation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve opening responseVSAvoidflow resistance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The movable core is divided into an inner core and an outer core that move independently. This segmentation allows the outer core to maintain a larger, more consistent gap with the holder, reducing flow resistance variation, while the inner core provides the necessary magnetic attraction response through its own magnetic circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The outer core features different gap configurations at different locations: a first gap configuration near the nozzle hole and a second gap configuration away from it. This local quality approach optimizes flow resistance characteristics in different regions, ensuring consistent performance throughout the valve operation cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If single core structure is used to simplify design, then device complexity is reduced, but moving speed variation occurs due to flow resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore structureVSAvoidmovable core speed consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The movable core is divided into an inner core and an outer core that move independently within the holder. The outer core is specifically designed to minimize flow resistance variation by maintaining optimized gaps with the holder, while the inner core provides magnetic attraction response. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, resulting in more consistent moving speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces variation in valve opening response and injection amount by minimizing the influence of gap variations on flow resistance, enabling consistent fuel injection even under high fuel pressures.

Implementation Method 1

a fixed core that generates a magnetic attraction force upon energization of a coil; a movable core that has a cylindrical shape and opens the nozzle hole by moving together with the valve body by the magnetic attraction force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction force: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11619200B2Fuel injection valve
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 DENSO CORP
  • US11619200B2 patent drawing
  • US11619200B2 patent drawing
  • US11619200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuel injection valve includes a valve body, a fixed core, a movable core, a holder, and a stopper. The movable core has an inner core that contacts the stopper, and an outer core press-fitted to an outer peripheral surface of the inner core. The outer core has, in a moving direction of the movable core, a press-fit region which is press-fitted to the outer peripheral surface of the inner core, and a non-press-fit region which is not press-fitted to the outer peripheral surface of the inner core and is adjacent to the press-fit region in the moving direction. Between the inner peripheral surface of the holder and the outer peripheral surface of the movable core, the smallest gap in the press-fit region is larger than the smallest gap in the non-press-fit region.