Fuel Injection Device Valve Timing Control for Piezoelectric Actuator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fuel injection devices with layered piezoelectric elements face instability in valve opening behavior during small injection quantities due to premature discharging before reaching the final charging voltage, leading to increased actual injection quantities and potential cost increases from requiring high-current drive circuits.

Innovation Solution

The fuel injection device sets different valve opening starting timings based on injection quantity, using a first timing for large quantities and a second, later timing for small quantities to delay valve opening and reduce actual injection, thereby stabilizing valve behavior without needing high-current drive circuits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the valve opening responsiveness is improved by expanding the out orifice aperture diameter and increasing the discharge flow rate, then the valve opening speed increases, but the actual injection quantity increases for the same injection command value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve opening speedVSAvoidactual injection quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the timing parameter of valve opening based on the injection quantity. For minute injections, it delays the valve opening timing by setting the injection command value to start charging later or to discharge later, thereby compensating for the increased injection quantity caused by faster valve opening and achieving precise control of the actual injection quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If the injection command value is reduced to compensate for increased actual injection quantity, then the injection quantity control improves, but the injection command value becomes extremely small and less than or equal to the charging period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection quantity control precisionVSAvoidinjection command value duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the injection control into two independent parameters: injection quantity (determined by charging/discharging amount) and injection timing (determined by valve opening timing). By separating these controls, it can maintain a normal injection command value duration while achieving precise injection quantity control through timing adjustment, avoiding the problem of extremely small command values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the valve opening timing based on the injection quantity requirements. For minute injections, it delays the valve opening timing; for normal injections, it uses the standard timing. This dynamic timing adjustment allows the system to maintain adequate injection command value durations while achieving precise injection quantity control across different injection scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If a high-current drive circuit is used to ensure sufficient charging current for the layered piezoelectric element, then the charging speed improves, but the device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial charging action by delaying the valve opening timing or reducing the charging amount specifically for minute injections, rather than requiring high charging current for all injection types. This allows the use of standard-current drive circuits while achieving the desired injection control through selective timing adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach stabilizes valve opening behavior during small injection quantities and maintains high responsiveness during large injection quantities without upgrading the drive circuit, effectively managing injection quantities and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

a layered piezoelectric element is used. When the layered piezoelectric element that expands/shrinks by charging/discharging of the electric charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The fuel injector increases/decreases the fuel pressure inside the control chamber by making a high pressure fuel to flow out from and flow in to the control chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure control: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS9945317B2Fuel injection device
Publication Date: 2018.04.17 DENSO CORP
  • US9945317B2 patent drawing
  • US9945317B2 patent drawing
  • US9945317B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When a main injection is performed, a first timing that is a time earlier than a second timing is selected as the valve opening starting timing, and a first period that is the period of time shorter than a second period is selected as the control period. Also, when a pilot injection is performed, the second timing that is the time later than the first timing is selected as the valve opening starting timing, and the second period that is the time longer than the first period is selected as the control period. Thus, in an injector with increased valve opening responsiveness, the valve opening behavior of a control valve of the injector in fuel injection with a minute injection quantity can be stabilized without replacing a control device, particularly an EDU with that of a large current specification.