Four-Stroke Engine Fuel Injector Intake Port Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In direct-injection engines, the placement of fuel injectors between or below intake ports restricts the shape of the intake ports, increasing fluid resistance and obstructing air flow to the combustion chamber, which decreases air flow rate and the effectiveness of direct injection.

Innovation Solution

A four-stroke engine design where a fuel injector is at least partially disposed at the intake port and a housing hole, jetting a fuel mist directly into the combustion chamber, allowing for improved cooling and increased air flow without altering the intake port shape, thus reducing fluid resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the fuel injector is disposed between the two intake ports, then the fuel injector can be positioned to supply fuel to the combustion chamber, but the shape or layout of the intake ports is restricted and fluid resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel injector positioningVSAvoidair flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injector is repositioned from being disposed between or below the intake ports to being disposed at the intake port itself, utilizing a different spatial dimension. The injector is arranged to extend through the intake port wall, with its tip positioned in the intake port passage, thereby eliminating the need to restrict intake port shape or layout while still achieving effective fuel delivery to the combustion chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If the fuel injector is disposed below the intake ports, then the fuel injector can be positioned to supply fuel to the combustion chamber, but the shape or layout of the intake ports is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel injector positioningVSAvoidintake port design flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injector is repositioned from being disposed below the intake ports to being disposed at the intake port wall, utilizing a different spatial dimension. The injector extends through the intake port wall with its tip positioned in the intake port passage, thereby eliminating the need to restrict intake port shape or layout while still achieving effective fuel delivery to the combustion chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel injector is positioned locally at the intake port wall rather than in a fixed location below the ports. This localized positioning allows the intake port to maintain its optimal shape and layout for air flow, while the injector specifically targets fuel delivery at the point where it can most effectively mix with the incoming air charge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If the intake port is greatly curved to accommodate the fuel injector, then the fuel injector space is ensured, but fluid resistance increases and air flow is obstructed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel injector space accommodationVSAvoidfluid resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injector is extracted from the space between or below the intake ports and repositioned to extend through the intake port wall itself. This extraction eliminates the need to curve the intake port to accommodate the injector, as the injector now occupies a different spatial location that does not interfere with the optimal shape of the intake port passage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances engine output and fuel efficiency by maintaining air flow while preventing knocking, and allows for a more flexible intake system layout.

Implementation Method 1

a fuel injector at least a portion of which is disposed at the intake port and at the housing hole and that supplies a mist of fuel directly to the combustion chamber by jetting the mist of fuel toward the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet: Jet

Implementation Method 2

the fuel mist (i.e., liquid droplets of fuel) jetted from the fuel injector is supplied directly to the combustion chamber. Therefore, the inside of the cylinder can be cooled by evaporating the fuel in the cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

the temperature of the inside of the cylinder decreases, and therefore knocking can be prevented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporative Cooler

Data Source

PatentUS9458807B2Four-stroke engine
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 YAMAHA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9458807B2 patent drawing
  • US9458807B2 patent drawing
  • US9458807B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A four-stroke engine includes a cylinder head in which a combustion chamber, an intake port that communicates with the combustion chamber, and a housing hole that passes through the combustion chamber and through the intake port are provided, and a fuel injector that supplies a mist of fuel directly to the combustion chamber by jetting the mist of fuel toward the combustion chamber. The fuel injector includes at least a portion that is disposed at the intake port and at the housing hole.