Fuel Injector Spray Control via Variable Pressure Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fuel injection techniques that divide an injection event into multiple portions with varying fuel flow rates increase fuel consumption and decrease engine efficiency while attempting to reduce NOx formation.

Innovation Solution

A fuel system with a variable pressure fuel supply and a fuel injector featuring two sets of needle valve elements and orifices, allowing for different pressure levels during an injection event to maintain a constant fuel flow rate, reducing NOx formation by controlling droplet size and combustion area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If fuel flow rate is reduced during initial portion of injection event, then NOx formation is reduced, but total length of injection event increases which increases fuel consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx formationVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The injection event is divided into two distinct portions: an initial portion with reduced fuel flow rate to control NOx formation, and a subsequent portion with unrestricted fuel flow rate to maintain engine efficiency. This segmentation allows the system to achieve both NOx reduction and fuel efficiency by optimizing fuel delivery at different stages of the injection event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel flow rate is dynamically adjusted during the injection event based on the specific requirements of each portion. The system transitions from a controlled, reduced flow rate during the initial portion to an unrestricted, higher flow rate during the subsequent portion, allowing optimal control of both NOx formation and fuel consumption at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If fuel flow rate is reduced during initial portion of injection event, then NOx formation is reduced, but injection event length increases which decreases engine efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx formationVSAvoidengine efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The injection event is segmented into two portions with different fuel flow characteristics. The initial portion uses reduced flow rate to minimize NOx formation, while the subsequent portion uses unrestricted flow rate to maintain high engine efficiency, thereby resolving the contradiction between NOx reduction and engine efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The injection event employs periodic variation in fuel flow rate, transitioning from a controlled rate during the initial portion to an unrestricted rate during the subsequent portion. This periodic action allows the system to achieve both NOx reduction and maintained engine efficiency by optimizing fuel delivery at different temporal stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If variable pressure fuel supply is used with two sets of injector orifices, then fuel flow rate can be maintained constant while reducing NOx, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx productionVSAvoidinjector structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The injector is segmented into two distinct sets of orifices: a first set for the initial portion of the injection event and a second set for the subsequent portion. Each set is controlled by its own needle valve element, allowing independent control of fuel flow rates to optimize NOx reduction while maintaining constant overall fuel flow rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the injector have different local qualities - the first set of orifices is optimized for controlled, reduced flow rate to minimize NOx formation, while the second set is optimized for unrestricted flow rate to maintain engine efficiency. This local differentiation allows each region to perform its specific function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces NOx production while maintaining engine efficiency by ensuring a constant fuel flow rate throughout the injection event, similar to conventional injectors, and effectively burning particulate matter with smaller droplets.

Implementation Method 1

A variable pressure fuel supply is configured to selectively supply fuel at different pressure levels to the injector cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The first needle valve element is movable from a closed position against the first valve seat blocking flow through the first set of injector orifices to an open position permitting flow through the first set of injector orifices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve control: Valve

Implementation Method 3

The plurality of injector orifices communicating with a first end of the injector cavity to discharge fuel into the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel spray: Fluid Spray

Data Source

PatentUS9562505B2System and method for control of fuel injector spray
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 CUMMINS-SCANIA HPCR SYST LLC
  • US9562505B2 patent drawing
  • US9562505B2 patent drawing
  • US9562505B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides an improved fuel injector and method of operating the fuel injector to provide at least two different types of fuel spray to a combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine. The two types of spray are formed by providing a first fuel pressure to the fuel injector during a first portion of an injection event at a first pressure and providing a second fuel pressure to the fuel injection during a second portion of the injection event, and maintaining a substantially constant fuel flow rate throughout the injection event.