On-Demand Fuel Supply Manifold for Spill-Safe Multi-Asset Refueling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fuel delivery systems are inefficient, prone to spills and leaks, and pose safety risks due to manual delivery methods, which can lead to exposure hazards and missed refueling of assets, especially in complex job sites with multiple fuel-consuming assets.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a pressurized second tank fluidically coupled to a first tank, with a manifold and spigot mechanism that allows for on-demand fuel delivery to multiple assets through a segmented hose and automated fill cap with a probe and valve system, preventing overfilling and reducing manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual fuel delivery is used, then flexibility and simplicity are maintained, but efficiency and safety deteriorate due to time-consuming one-at-a-time delivery and spill risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel delivery efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments fuel delivery into multiple parallel pathways through the manifold structure, allowing simultaneous delivery to multiple assets. The segmented hose with multiple outlets enables one operator to service multiple assets concurrently, dramatically improving productivity without requiring complex automated robotic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The manifold serves multiple functions: it distributes fuel to multiple outlets, provides pressurization through the integrated pump, and enables simultaneous servicing of multiple assets. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate delivery systems into a single versatile unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If manual hose delivery is used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but safety deteriorates due to spill risks and operator exposure hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates self-regulating features including automatic shut-off valves at each outlet that prevent overfilling and spills, and an integrated pump system that self-regulates fuel flow. The quick-connect couplings automatically seal when disconnected, preventing spills during hose changes. These self-service features reduce operator intervention and exposure while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manifold acts as an intermediary between the fuel source and multiple assets, providing controlled distribution through regulated outlets. This intermediary structure prevents direct uncontrolled fuel flow, reducing spill risks compared to manual hose delivery while adding only moderate system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring of fuel levels is performed, then fuel availability is ensured, but time and resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel availabilityVSAvoidmonitoring time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates level sensors in each asset's tank that provide feedback to the control system. When fuel levels drop below a threshold, the system automatically activates the pump and manifold to replenish fuel, eliminating the need for continuous manual monitoring. This automated feedback loop ensures fuel availability while freeing operator time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If one operator delivers fuel to multiple assets sequentially, then resource utilization is optimized, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming sequential delivery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel delivery speedVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The manifold segments the fuel delivery stream into multiple parallel outlets, allowing a single operator to simultaneously service multiple assets. This segmentation transforms sequential delivery into parallel operations, multiplying productivity without proportionally increasing operational complexity since the operator simply monitors multiple connected assets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient, safe, and automated fuel delivery to multiple assets simultaneously, minimizing spills, reducing operator exposure, and ensuring continuous fuel supply based on asset consumption without manual monitoring.

Implementation Method 1

a second tank pressurized

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-driven flow: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11111126B2Methods and systems for on demand fuel supply
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 TEXAS FUELING SERVICES INC
  • US11111126B2 patent drawing
  • US11111126B2 patent drawing
  • US11111126B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of delivering a fluid to a fluid consuming asset having a fluid tank is disclosed. A first tank is filled with the fluid and is fluidically coupled to a second tank which may be pressurized by a compressor. The second tank is fluidically coupled to a manifold which is in turn coupled to a fluid transporting mechanism. The fluid transporting mechanism is fluidically coupled to a hydraulic connector of a fill cap which is coupled to an opening of the fluid tank. The fluid is directed from the first tank to the second tank, the manifold, the fluid transporting mechanism, the hydraulic connector and into the fluid tank through an outlet of a probe of the fill cap.