Fuel Nozzle and Swirler Layout for Hydrogen Flashback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current combustors face durability issues when using high-temperature fuels due to flame holding or flashback, which are exacerbated by the higher flame speed and burn temperatures of fuels like hydrogen or hydrogen-based fuels, leading to reduced combustor component durability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a fuel nozzle and swirler architecture that includes a secondary fuel passage system, with outlets on both interior and exterior surfaces of the splitter, and a swirler with varying vane angles to manage fuel distribution, reducing flame holding and flashback, and enhancing fuel mixing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-temperature fuels like hydrogen are used to improve combustion efficiency and reduce emissions, then combustion efficiency is improved, but flame holding and flashback occur leading to reduced combustor component durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidcombustor component durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection system is segmented into multiple nozzles with different injection patterns (coaxial, counter-swirling, parallel) to distribute fuel more effectively and control flame propagation, preventing flame holding and flashback while maintaining high combustion efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses variable injection parameters and dynamic fuel distribution control to adapt to different operating conditions, allowing the combustor to maintain stability and prevent flashback across a range of high-temperature fuel combustion scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If fuel injection rate is increased to improve combustion completeness, then combustion completeness is improved, but flame speed increases leading to flashback and reduced component durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion completenessVSAvoidflame speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the combustor receive fuel with different injection characteristics (swirl rates, injection angles, timing) to locally control combustion intensity and flame speed, achieving complete combustion without excessive flame propagation speed that would cause flashback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic or pulsed fuel injection patterns that synchronize with flame propagation characteristics, allowing complete combustion while controlling the timing and rate of fuel delivery to prevent flashback conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Device complexity

If single fuel passage design is used to simplify structure, then device complexity is reduced, but fuel distribution control and mixing efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel passage structureVSAvoidfuel mixing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel passage system is divided into multiple independent passages, each serving specific injection functions (coaxial injection, swirler injection, pilot injection), enabling precise control of fuel distribution and improved mixing efficiency while maintaining manageable structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-passage fuel injection system is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously (primary fuel delivery, pilot ignition, swirl generation, flame stabilization) across different operating conditions, achieving superior fuel mixing efficiency without proportionally increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves combustor durability and reduces NOx and carbon emissions by stabilizing the flame and controlling fuel distribution, even with high-temperature fuels, thereby increasing the operational efficiency and reducing emissions.

Implementation Method 1

a swirler with varying vane angles to manage fuel distribution, reducing flame holding and flashback, and enhancing fuel mixing efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

The engine utilizes a fuel nozzle to inject the combustible fuel into the combustor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel injection and atomization: Fluid Spray

Implementation Method 3

An engine, such as a turbine engine that includes a turbine, is driven by combustion of a combustible fuel within a combustor of the engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS20260071755A1Fuel nozzle and swirler
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US20260071755A1 patent drawing
  • US20260071755A1 patent drawing
  • US20260071755A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine can utilize a combustor to combust fuel to drive the engine. A fuel nozzle assembly can supply fuel to the combustor for combustion or ignition of the fuel. The fuel nozzle assembly can include a swirler and a fuel nozzle to supply a mixture of fuel and air for combustion, which can supply a primary fuel supply and a secondary fuel supply. Increasing efficiency and reducing emission require the use of alternative fuels, which combust at higher temperatures or burn at faster burn speeds than traditional fuels, requiring improved fuel introduction without the occurrence of flame holding or flashback.