Multi-Store Fuel Pricing Optimization System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current price optimization systems for retail motor fuel stores are ineffective due to volatile fuel costs, prominent price displays, intense competition, and regulatory constraints, failing to account for seasonal traffic patterns and the impact of rewards programs, leading to suboptimal pricing decisions and compliance issues.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a computer-connected database and electronic signs to create a correlation matrix and economic model that determines optimal fuel prices across multiple stores, considering competitor prices, reward discounts, and profit margins, ensuring maximum multi-store profit while adhering to regulatory requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If fuel prices are updated frequently to reflect volatile replacement costs, then pricing responsiveness to market changes is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing responsivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic pricing by continuously updating fuel prices based on volatile replacement costs and market conditions. The economic model automatically adjusts prices in real-time rather than using static monthly pricing, allowing the system to adapt to changing oil prices, competitor actions, and demand patterns without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where sales volume data, competitor price data, and replacement cost information are continuously collected and fed back into the economic model. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from past pricing decisions and optimize future price settings, improving responsiveness while managing complexity through automated learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a multi-store optimization process is implemented to maximize total profit, then overall profitability is improved, but the complexity of price coordination across stores increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall profitabilityVSAvoidprice coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges individual store optimization into a unified multi-store optimization process. The economic model considers the entire chain's total profit rather than optimizing each store independently, coordinating prices across multiple locations to maximize aggregate profitability while accounting for inter-store competition and market overlaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The economic model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it optimizes individual store prices, coordinates multi-store pricing strategies, monitors competitor prices, tracks replacement costs, and ensures regulatory compliance. This universal approach handles price coordination complexity through a single integrated system rather than separate mechanisms for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If rewards programs are integrated into pricing strategy, then consumer loyalty and volume are improved, but pricing strategy complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel volume salesVSAvoidpricing strategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages rewards program complexity by treating reward rates as adjustable parameters within the economic model. Different reward rates can be applied to different stores, time periods, or customer segments based on what the model determines will maximize profit and volume, allowing flexible optimization without creating rigid complex rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20200380569A9System and Method for Optimizing Retail Fuel Stores
Publication Date: 2020.12.03 SKYLINE PRODS
  • US20200380569A9 patent drawing
  • US20200380569A9 patent drawing
  • US20200380569A9 patent drawing

AI summary

Multiple retail fuel stores are optimized using system having a computer in communication with a database. Remote computing devices are connected to the first computer by a communication system. Electronic signs receive an instruction over the communication system. The system creates a correlation matrix having fuel prices for the retail fuel stores, a reward discount, and competitor fuel prices, a profit for the fuel prices for each of the retail fuel stores, and a volume. It also creates an economic model that receives a number of correlation coefficients from the correlation matrix at the first computer. A multi-store optimization process configures the economic model to determine optimal fuel prices for retail fuel stores based on a total multi-store profit.