Fuel Pump Roller Profile Reduces Edge Stress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanical fuel pump rollers experience premature failure due to high contact pressures and subsurface stresses at the edge portions during operation, which is exacerbated by the need for adequate hydrodynamic wedging and lift, leading to conflicting design challenges.

Innovation Solution

A roller profile with specific areas of reduced cross section, featuring radii of curvature to alleviate contact pressure at the axial ends, and a uniform circular cross section over a defined length, optimizing hydrodynamic wedging and lift while reducing stress on the roller-cam contact areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the roller length is increased to achieve adequate hydrodynamic wedging and lift, then hydrodynamic performance is improved, but contact pressure at the edge portions increases causing premature failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller service lifeVSAvoidcontact pressure at edge portions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The roller transitions from a uniform cylindrical shape to a non-uniform profile where different sections have different cross-sectional areas. The intermediate portion maintains a larger cross-section for hydrodynamic performance, while the end portions have reduced cross-sections to lower contact pressure and prevent premature failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The roller profile incorporates curved transitions between sections with different cross-sectional areas. These curved portions smooth the stress distribution and eliminate sharp edges that would concentrate stress, while maintaining the beneficial reduced contact pressure at the ends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Reliability

If the roller length is increased to achieve adequate hydrodynamic wedging and lift, then hydrodynamic performance is improved, but the roller complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrodynamic performanceVSAvoidroller profile complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roller is divided into distinct sections along its length: end portions with reduced cross-sections and an intermediate portion with a larger cross-section. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If the roller length is decreased to reduce manufacturing complexity, then ease of manufacture is improved, but hydrodynamic wedging and lift are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidhydrodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The roller cross-sectional area parameter is varied along its length rather than remaining constant. This parameter change creates a profile that optimizes both hydrodynamic performance and stress distribution, achieving better overall performance without requiring complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized roller profile significantly reduces contact pressures at the axial ends, preventing premature failure and maintaining adequate hydrodynamic performance, as demonstrated by contact pressure analysis and testing.

Implementation Method 1

The exterior surface 24 rotates hydro-dynamically on a hydraulic wedge of lubricant 40 in the seating surface 34 of the shoe 30

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic wedging: Lubrication

Implementation Method 2

a hydraulic wedge of lubricant 40 in the seating surface 34 of the shoe 30, as shown in FIG. 3. The wedge 40 lifts the roller 20 away from the shoe 30

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic wedge: Wedge

Implementation Method 3

The exterior surface 24 of the roller 20 rolls on the cam surface 22B as the cam 22 rotates around an axis A2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling contact: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3048293B1Roller for fuel pump actuator
Publication Date: 2019.09.18 ROLLER BEARING OF AMERICA INC
  • EP3048293B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3048293B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3048293B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A roller (120) for a mechanical fuel pump assembly includes an elongate body. The elongate body defines an effective length (L1) that is less than its overall length (L). The elongate body defines a uniform circular cross section over a second length (L2) of the elongate body. The second length (L2) is 75 to 90 percent of the effective length (L1) and the second length (L2) extends between a first plane (A) and a second plane (A'). A first area of reduced cross section extends axially outward from the first plane (A) to a third plane (B) located axially inward of the first axial end; and a second area of reduced cross section extends axially outward from the second plane (A') to a fourth plane (B') located axially inward of the second axial end.