Aircraft Fuel Quantity Prediction Using Orientation Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft fuel gauging systems rely on capacitance measurements and are prone to inaccuracies due to factors like aircraft orientation and non-fuel system states, which can lead to incorrect fuel quantity estimation and potential system faults.

Innovation Solution

A processor-based monitoring apparatus that receives and processes information on fuel parameters, fuel system configuration, aircraft orientation, and non-fuel system states, using machine learning algorithms to predict fuel quantity independently of primary gauging systems and detect potential faults.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If capacitance measurements from probes are used to estimate fuel quantity, then fuel gauging can be implemented, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to aircraft orientation and non-fuel system states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel quantity estimation accuracyVSAvoidinfluence of aircraft orientation and system states
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fuel measurement problem into multiple independent measurement sources: capacitance measurements from multiple probes, fuel level sensor outputs, and measurements of physical attributes (temperature, density, permittivity). Each measurement type is processed separately and then integrated to compensate for the limitations of individual methods, particularly regarding aircraft orientation effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring apparatus performs multiple functions: it processes capacitance measurements, integrates fuel level sensor data, measures physical attributes of fuel, compensates for aircraft orientation effects, and detects system faults. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to address various sources of measurement error and provide accurate fuel quantity estimation under diverse operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple data sources are integrated to improve fuel quantity accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel quantity prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple data sources (capacitance measurements from multiple probes, fuel level sensor outputs, physical attribute measurements, and aircraft orientation data) into a unified fuel quantity estimation. By combining these diverse measurements and processing them through an integrated monitoring apparatus, the system achieves accurate fuel quantity prediction while managing complexity through systematic data integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring apparatus acts as an intermediary that receives and processes data from various sensors and systems, then generates corrected fuel quantity estimates. This intermediary processing layer integrates information from capacitance probes, level sensors, and physical attribute measurements while compensating for orientation effects, providing a unified accurate output without requiring direct complex interactions between all sensor components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If traditional fuel gauging systems are used, then fuel quantity can be monitored, but fault detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel system monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidfault detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring multiple parameters (capacitance measurements, fuel level sensor outputs, physical attributes) and comparing them against expected relationships. When discrepancies are detected that indicate potential faults in the fuel system or non-fuel systems affecting measurement accuracy, the monitoring apparatus generates indications to alert operators, enabling timely fault detection and correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides accurate fuel quantity predictions and fault detection, enhancing fuel management and system reliability by integrating diverse data sources and machine learning for improved accuracy and fault identification.

Implementation Method 1

the processor is configured to use a machine learning algorithm to generate the prediction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMachine learning:

Implementation Method 2

Fuel gauging systems in commercial aircraft typically estimate the current quantity of fuel in a given tank on the aircraft based on capacitance measurements from probes distributed around the tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS12091197B2Aircraft fuel system monitoring
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • US12091197B2 patent drawing
  • US12091197B2 patent drawing
  • US12091197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft fuel system monitoring apparatus is disclosed having a processor configured to receive first information indicative of one or more parameters relating to fuel present in an aircraft; receive second information relating to the configuration of a fuel system of the aircraft; receive third information indicative of an orientation of the aircraft; receive fourth information indicative of a state of one or more non-fuel-related systems of the aircraft; and generate a prediction of a quantity of fuel present in the aircraft based on the received first information, the received second information, and one or both of the received third information and the received fourth information.