Fuel Reformer Feedback Control for NOx Emission Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fuel reformer control systems struggle to accurately regulate NOx emissions and engine performance under changing fuel qualities and conditions, leading to suboptimal combustion stability and slow response times, making them unsuitable for transient applications.

Innovation Solution

A feedback control system that uses sensors to measure engine operating parameters correlated with NOx emissions, allowing a controller to adjust the reformer's operation to match target emission levels by adjusting temperature, pressure, and flow rate, ensuring precise syngas generation and optimal engine performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If lean burn technology is used to reduce NOx emissions, then NOx emission is reduced, but combustion stability deteriorates due to increased COV of IMEP and misfire risk

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx emissionVSAvoidcombustion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the fuel by introducing syngas (containing H2 and CO) into the combustion chamber. This modifies the air-fuel mixture composition to improve combustion stability while maintaining lean burn conditions for NOx reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite fuel mixture by combining original hydrocarbon fuel with syngas (H2 and CO). This composite mixture leverages the advantages of both components: the syngas provides improved combustion stability and the overall mixture maintains lean burn characteristics for NOx reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If hydrocarbon fuel is enriched with hydrogen through reforming, then combustion stability is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional reformer equipment and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoidreformer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reformer system is designed to serve multiple functions: it reforms hydrocarbon fuel into syngas, regulates the syngas flow rate, and integrates with the existing engine control system. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the engine control unit monitors combustion conditions and adjusts the reformer operation accordingly. This feedback mechanism optimizes syngas production and injection timing, improving combustion stability while managing system complexity through intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If traditional independent control of reformer and engine is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to changing fuel qualities and operating conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to fuel quality changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control functions of the reformer and the engine into an integrated control system. The engine control unit coordinates both systems, allowing them to respond synergistically to changing fuel qualities and operating conditions, thereby improving adaptability while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If rigid control scheme with fixed syngas generation is used, then ease of operation is improved, but response time to changing conditions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol operation simplicityVSAvoidsystem response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a rigid, fixed control scheme to a dynamic control system where the reformer operation is continuously adjusted based on real-time feedback from the engine control unit. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to respond quickly to changing fuel qualities and operating conditions while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enables precise control of NOx emissions and improved engine performance by dynamically adjusting syngas production based on real-time feedback, ensuring compliance with emission targets even under varying conditions, and enhancing combustion stability and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a reformer may be used to reform at least part of the fuel into a synthesis gas (syngas), mainly including H2 and carbon monoxide (CO)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel reforming: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 2

The syngas is then mixed with the air and unreformed fuel to form a H2-rich mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas mixing: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

Internal combustion engines may be configured to combust hydrocarbon fuel to produce power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS10260460B2Feedback control of fuel reformer-engine system
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US10260460B2 patent drawing
  • US10260460B2 patent drawing
  • US10260460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for reforming a fuel may include a first sensor configured to measure an operating parameter of an engine. The operating parameter may correlate to a NOx emission level of the engine. The system may also include a controller in communication with the sensor and a reformer. The controller may be configured to determine a target NOx emission level for the engine. The controller may be also configured to determine a target value of the operating parameter corresponding to the target NOx emission level. The controller may be further configured to control the reformer to reform at least a portion of the fuel based on a difference between the measured value and the target value of the operating parameter.