Fuel System Reservoir Segmentation for Dual-Fuel Mixing Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dual fuel engines face challenges in preventing the mixing of different fuel types before reaching the combustion chambers, leading to increased complexity and cost when using separate fuel injection systems, and risk of fuel mixing when sharing a conduit.

Innovation Solution

A fuel system with a reservoir and separation device that divides into two volumes, allowing a single high-pressure pump to pressurize one fuel for injection and use as a working fluid to pump the second fuel, ensuring separate delivery of fuels through separate conduits and injectors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If two complete fuel injection systems with separate pumps, common rails and injectors are provided for each fuel type, then the risk of fuel mixing is eliminated, but the system complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel mixing preventionVSAvoidfuel injection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The common rail is segmented into two separate volumes (first volume and second volume) using a separation device, allowing each fuel type to be contained in its own space while sharing the same physical rail structure. This segmentation prevents fuel mixing while avoiding the need for completely separate injection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A separation device acts as an intermediary element within the common rail, physically dividing the two fuel volumes and preventing mixing. This intermediary structure enables single-rail operation with dual fuel types without requiring full system separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a single high pressure pump is used for both fuel types, then the system complexity and cost are reduced, but the risk of fuel mixing increases when sharing a conduit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel injection system complexityVSAvoidfuel mixing prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The common rail is divided into separate volumes for each fuel type, creating distinct pathways within the shared conduit system. This allows a single pump to serve both fuels without direct mixing, as the separation device maintains physical boundaries between fuel streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The single high pressure pump performs multiple functions by pressurizing both fuel types through the shared pump inlet, while the segmented common rail ensures proper separation. This universal approach reduces component count while maintaining fuel integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fuels with poor lubrication properties or unfavorable viscosity are used, then fuel flexibility and environmental benefits are improved, but the pump may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel type flexibilityVSAvoidpump durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The first fuel acts as an intermediary lubricating medium between the pump and the second fuel. Since the first fuel has good lubrication properties, it protects the pump during handling, while allowing the use of second fuels with poor lubrication properties that would otherwise damage the pump.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The first fuel serves dual purposes: it is both the injected fuel for combustion and the working fluid that lubricates the pump and drives the separation device. This self-service approach allows the pump to be protected by a fuel it already handles for injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution minimizes fuel mixing risk, reduces system complexity and cost by using a single high-pressure pump for both fuels, and allows for the use of fuels with poor lubrication properties or unfavorable viscosity without damaging the pump.

Implementation Method 1

the separation device may be moved or flexed by a pressure difference in the first and second volumes so as to change the sizes of the first and second volumes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the pump is suitably arranged to pressurize first fuel from the first fuel container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurization: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS10724449B2Fuel system for an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US10724449B2 patent drawing
  • US10724449B2 patent drawing
  • US10724449B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuel system for an internal combustion engine is provided including a first fuel container for a first fuel, a second fuel container for a second fuel, a pump, and a first fuel injector, the fuel system being arranged to provide a communication between the first fuel container and the pump and between the pump and the first fuel injector, and a reservoir with a separation device adapted to divide the reservoir into a first volume and a second volume, whereby the separation device may be moved or flexed by a pressure difference in the first and second volumes so as to change the sizes of the first and second volumes, wherein the fuel system is arranged to provide a communication between the pump and the first volume, and to provide a communication between the second fuel container and the second volume and between the second volume and a second fuel injector.