Gas Turbine Fuel Shutoff Apparatus with Latching Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fuel systems for gas turbine engines lack an efficient mechanism to quickly stop fuel flow during engine overspeed events, potentially leading to damage.

Innovation Solution

A fuel flow system incorporating a shutoff apparatus with an engine overspeed electro-mechanical interface device and valves that allow for selective energization to stop fuel flow without operating the metering valve, ensuring rapid shutdown and latching in shutdown mode even when de-energized.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the metering valve is used to stop fuel flow, then the fuel flow can be controlled, but the shutdown speed is insufficient and may cause engine damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutdown speedVSAvoidengine safety
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel flow control system is segmented into multiple independent valves: the metering valve for normal flow control and the minimum pressure shut-off valve for emergency shutdown. This segmentation allows the shut-off valve to operate independently at high speed without affecting the metering valve's positioning, resolving the contradiction between shutdown speed and engine safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A latch mechanism acts as an intermediary between the shut-off valve and the control system. The latch mechanically holds the shut-off valve in the closed position after actuation, maintaining fuel flow stoppage even when the control system is de-energized, thereby ensuring engine safety while enabling rapid initial shutdown

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If the shut-off apparatus is de-energized after shutdown, then energy is saved, but the shutdown state may not be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidshutdown state stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism is designed to be self-latching, automatically maintaining the shut-off valve in the closed position without requiring continuous external energy input. Once the shut-off valve is actuated, the latch mechanically secures it in place, making the system self-sufficient for maintaining the shutdown state and enabling energy savings while ensuring state stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism serves as an intermediary that decouples the control system's energy state from the valve's position state. It translates a brief energization event into a persistent mechanical state, ensuring shutdown stability independent of the control system's power status while allowing energy savings when de-energized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If a rapid shutdown mechanism is added, then shutdown speed improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutdown speedVSAvoidvalve and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The minimum pressure shut-off valve is designed to serve multiple functions: normal fuel flow regulation, emergency rapid shutdown, and latching state maintenance. By making this single component multi-functional, the system achieves rapid shutdown capability without adding separate dedicated components for each function, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism is integrated directly into the shut-off valve assembly, combining the shutdown actuation function and the state maintenance function into a single unified component. This merging eliminates the need for separate latch actuators and control circuits, achieving rapid shutdown with minimal additional complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid and reliable shutdown of fuel flow during engine overspeed events, preventing damage and maintaining the shutdown state until the system is manually reset.

Implementation Method 1

The engine overspeed electro-mechanical interface device is selectably energized to pressurize fluid to operate the engine overspeed valve via pressurization of the fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurization: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 2

A minimum pressure shut-off valve is fluidly connected to the one or more pumps

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11808218B1Rapid fuel shutdown system with latching
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US11808218B1 patent drawing
  • US11808218B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuel flow system for a gas turbine engine includes a fuel inlet to admit a flow of fuel into the fuel flow system and a fuel outlet to direct the flow of fuel to the gas turbine engine from the fuel flow system. One or more pumps are positioned along a fuel flow path connecting the fuel inlet to the fuel outlet. A metering valve is in flow communication with the one or more pumps to meter the flow of fuel. A minimum pressure shut-off valve is fluidly connected to the one or more pumps, and a shutoff apparatus configured to permit selective energizing to stop the flow of fuel from the fuel outlet without operation of the metering valve.