Fuel Tank Pressure Sensor Malfunction Detection via Atmospheric Venting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressure sensor malfunction determination devices for fuel tanks require additional pressure sensors, increasing component count and cost, whereas the goal is to detect malfunctions without additional sensors.

Innovation Solution

A pressure sensor malfunction determination device that uses the fuel tank pressure sensor to detect predetermined pressure states and performs valve-opening control on the tank on-off solenoid valve to determine if the sensor output corresponds to atmospheric pressure, allowing for malfunction detection without additional sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If additional pressure sensors are installed to determine malfunction, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure sensor malfunction detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of pressure sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing fuel tank pressure sensor is made to serve dual functions: monitoring fuel tank pressure during normal operation and detecting sensor malfunction by comparing readings during controlled atmospheric pressure conditions. This eliminates the need for separate malfunction detection sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own existing pressure sensor to detect its own malfunction by creating a self-test condition where the sensor reading is compared against a known reference (atmospheric pressure) during a controlled state, allowing the sensor to verify its own functionality without external assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the fuel tank is sealed to prevent evaporation leakage, then environmental protection is improved, but pressure control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaporation leakage to atmosphereVSAvoidpressure control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealed fuel tank system incorporates a dynamically controllable valve that can switch between closed (sealed) and open (ventilated) states. This dynamic element allows the system to maintain sealing during normal operation while providing a controlled pathway for pressure equalization when needed, managing pressure without requiring complex active control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the tank on-off solenoid valve is opened to equalize pressure, then pressure control is improved, but fuel feeding time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure equalization for fuel feedingVSAvoidfuel feeding duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary pressure equalization by opening the tank on-off solenoid valve before the fuel feeding operation begins. This ensures that the fuel tank pressure is already equalized with atmospheric pressure when fuel feeding starts, eliminating delays during the actual fuel transfer operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The tank on-off solenoid valve is opened periodically or in discrete steps during the fuel feeding process to maintain pressure equalization. This periodic ventilation allows pressure to be equalized in controlled intervals rather than requiring continuous valve opening, minimizing the impact on fuel feeding time while ensuring pressure control is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Accurately detects pressure sensor malfunctions in both positive and negative pressure states, enabling fuel feeding only when the sensor output matches atmospheric pressure, thus eliminating the need for extra sensors and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

The canister is configured to absorb an evaporated fuel gas in the fuel tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

a fuel tank pressure sensor configured to detect a pressure in the fuel tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10907582B2Pressure sensor malfunction determination device for fuel tank
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 SUBARU CORP
  • US10907582B2 patent drawing
  • US10907582B2 patent drawing
  • US10907582B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure sensor malfunction determination device for a fuel tank includes a fuel tank that stores fuel, a canister that absorbs an evaporated fuel gas and includes a drain port opened to atmosphere, an evaporation path communicating with the canister and fuel tank, a purge gas path communicating with an engine inlet system and the canister, a pressure sensor that detects a pressure, a solenoid valve that opens/closes the evaporation path, and a control unit that controls an opening/closing state of the solenoid valve. When the fuel tank pressure is one of predetermined positive and negative pressure states, the control unit performs valve-opening control on the solenoid valve. The control unit includes a pressure sensor malfunction determination unit that, when an output value of the pressure sensor detected under an atmospheric pressure condition corresponds to a pressure other than the atmospheric pressure, determines that the pressure sensor is malfunctioning.