Fulfillment Option Optimization for Marketplace Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In online multi-seller marketplaces, users face complexity in selecting offers for items as they often do not recognize how individual offers contribute to fulfillment option benefits, such as free shipping, leading to missed cost-saving opportunities due to unawareness of alternative offers that could meet qualification thresholds.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes and ranks offers to identify which combinations of offers can qualify for fulfillment benefits, providing notifications to users on alternative offers that contribute to these benefits, allowing them to make informed decisions and maximize savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users manually review and select offers from multiple sellers, then they can choose the best price and shipping options, but the complexity of analyzing multiple offers increases and users may miss fulfillment benefits they are unaware of

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of offer selectionVSAvoidcomplexity of offer analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically analyzes offer combinations and identifies fulfillment benefits without requiring user intervention. The offer analysis engine autonomously evaluates multiple offers, determines qualification status, and presents optimized selections to users, eliminating the need for manual analysis while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users by notifying them of fulfillment benefits they qualify for and suggesting alternative offers that meet thresholds. This feedback loop helps users understand the value of different offer combinations without requiring them to manually evaluate each option, simplifying the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If users are presented with multiple offer options, then they have more choices for price and shipping, but they may not recognize which offers contribute to fulfillment benefits like free shipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoffer options availabilityVSAvoidunawareness of fulfillment benefits
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to users by notifying them of fulfillment benefits they qualify for and suggesting alternative offers that meet thresholds. This feedback loop helps users understand the value of different offer combinations without requiring them to manually evaluate each option, simplifying the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses visual highlighting and formatting to emphasize offers that contribute to fulfillment benefits. By visually distinguishing qualifying offers from non-qualifying ones, the system makes fulfillment benefit information salient and easy to perceive, preventing users from losing awareness of available benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Productivity

If the system analyzes all possible offer combinations to maximize fulfillment benefits, then users can access more savings opportunities, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefulfillment benefit optimizationVSAvoidcomplexity of offer analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the offer analysis into manageable components by evaluating offers individually against fulfillment benefit thresholds rather than analyzing all possible combinations simultaneously. This segmentation reduces computational complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage of fulfillment opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial analysis by focusing on offers that are most likely to qualify for fulfillment benefits based on predefined thresholds and user preferences, rather than exhaustively analyzing all possible combinations. This approach achieves sufficient optimization without the full computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10489841B1Fulfillment option optimization
Publication Date: 2019.11.26 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10489841B1 patent drawing
  • US10489841B1 patent drawing
  • US10489841B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The optimization of fulfillment option benefits is described. In one example, selected offers for items are assembled for a transaction. A fulfillment option benefit, such as a delivery or shipping benefit, is identified for a first one of the items. A system determines whether an offer for a second one of the items contributes to qualification for the same fulfillment option benefit. When the offer for the second item does not contribute, the system searches for any other second item offers that do contribute to qualification for the benefit. If multiple other offers are found, the system ranks the other offers to identify a preferred other offer for the second item. The system then calculates a difference between the originally-selected offer and the preferred offer for the second item and generates a qualification contribution notification that highlights the preferred other offer as contributing to the fulfillment option benefit.