Full Caliber Projectile with Ogival Tip and Folding Tail

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Long-range anti-tank projectiles face challenges in achieving high payload volume, stable flight behavior, and low speed loss while maintaining accuracy, especially when fired from smoothbore guns, due to manufacturing deviations and sensitivity to disturbances.

Innovation Solution

A wing-stabilized, full-caliber projectile design combining shape stabilization, ogival tip contour, and a folding mechanism, featuring a sub-caliber spike for initial stability, ogival tip for payload volume, and a folding tail unit for aerodynamic stability, with a cylindrical body and progressively decreasing diameter to minimize velocity drop and flow resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a full-caliber ogival projectile is used to maximize payload volume, then the payload capacity is improved, but the projectile becomes sensitive to disturbances and loses speed due to low stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload volumeVSAvoidflight stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The projectile is divided into functionally distinct segments: a cylindrical body for payload, an ogival tip for aerodynamic efficiency, and a separate tail unit with wings for stabilization. This segmentation allows each part to optimize its specific function without compromising the others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tail unit with wings is designed to be dynamically deployed during flight. The wings can be folded during launch and then unfolded in flight to provide stabilization, allowing the projectile to transition from a compact launch configuration to a stabilized flight configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If wing stabilization is used to improve flight stability, then the stability is improved, but the device complexity increases due to folding mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight stabilityVSAvoidfolding mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilization system is segmented into modular components (tail unit, wings, folding mechanism) that can be independently optimized. This modularity reduces overall complexity by allowing each component to perform a specific function with minimal interference from other parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The folding mechanism transforms the rigid tail unit into a dynamic structure that adapts its configuration during flight. The wings are folded during launch to minimize interference with the barrel and then deployed in flight to provide stabilization, reducing complexity at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a rigid tail unit is used to simplify the structure, then the device complexity is reduced, but the available space for payload is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetail unit structureVSAvoidusable payload space
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The tail unit transitions from a compact folded state during launch to an extended deployed state during flight. This dynamic transformation allows the payload compartment to maximize its volume during loading and transport, while the tail unit provides full stabilization functionality during flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The wings are nested within or alongside the cylindrical body during the launch phase, utilizing the available space efficiently. When deployed, the wings extend outward without requiring additional overall length, maximizing payload volume while maintaining stabilization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Speed

If the projectile diameter is reduced to minimize flow resistance, then the velocity maintenance is improved, but the payload volume decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity maintenanceVSAvoidpayload volume
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The projectile features different diameters in different sections: a full-caliber cylindrical body for maximum payload volume, and a reduced-diameter ogival tip for minimized flow resistance. This local variation in geometry allows the projectile to maximize payload capacity while maintaining velocity through the aerodynamically optimized nose section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design ensures accurate and stable flight over distances greater than 2500 meters with minimal speed loss and enhanced aerodynamic stability, outperforming previous solutions by reducing velocity drop and maintaining stability during unfolding.

Implementation Method 1

a folding mechanism ensures aerodynamic stability even with decreasing projectile speeds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic stability: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The adjoining ogival tip area ensures sufficient payload volume and low speed loss

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow resistance reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP1757899B1Full caliber projectile for smooth bore barrel
Publication Date: 2008.04.02 RHEINMETALL WAFFE MUNITION GMBH
  • EP1757899B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A long range large caliber tank shell (1) comprises a cylindrical body (2) with a primary section (11), a secondary section (12) at the front, a spike shaped tip (7), and a contact surface (8). The rear has a guide member. The outer diameter of the contact surface is smaller than the shell caliber.