Full-Car Elevator Call Registration for Additional Dispatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Elevator systems often face situations where passenger demand exceeds capacity, leading to full cars that cannot accommodate additional passengers, causing frustration and prolonged waiting times, especially during peak periods like hotel checkout times.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dispatch controller that allows passengers to place a second request for elevator service using hall call or full car service request buttons while the full elevator car is at the landing, utilizing sensors to validate the need for an additional car by detecting non-boarded passengers or changes in load/occupancy, and assigning a second elevator car to meet the demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the elevator car stops at intermediate floors to pick up passengers, then the car serves more passengers, but the car remains full and cannot accommodate additional passengers, causing prolonged waiting times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger service capacityVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The dispatch controller proactively monitors elevator car occupancy and preemptively dispatches additional cars before passengers miss their rides. When a car is detected to be full at an intermediate floor, the system automatically sends another car to that floor, preventing passenger frustration and eliminating the need for repeated call button presses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the call button repeatedly triggers door reopening for full cars, then the system responds to passenger requests, but the car remains at the landing longer, increasing wait times for both boarded and unboarded passengers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecall button responsivenessVSAvoidlanding occupancy time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The dispatch controller continuously receives feedback from occupancy sensors and call buttons. When a call button is pressed at a floor where a full car is present, the controller uses occupancy feedback to determine that another car should be dispatched instead of allowing the full car to remain at the landing, thus resolving the conflict between responsiveness and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the elevator system uses typical dispatching algorithms, then the system operates efficiently under normal conditions, but fails to handle peak traffic scenarios where demand exceeds capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelevator utilization efficiencyVSAvoidpeak demand handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The dispatch controller dynamically adjusts its dispatching strategy based on real-time occupancy data and traffic patterns. During peak periods, the system transitions from traditional efficiency-optimized dispatching to a mode that proactively sends additional cars when occupancy thresholds are reached, adapting to changing demand conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12421076B2Elevator call registration when a car is full
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • US12421076B2 patent drawing
  • US12421076B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An illustrative example elevator system includes a plurality of elevator cars. A dispatch controller assigns a first one of the elevator cars to travel to a landing in response to a first request for elevator service at that landing. At least one call button is operative to place a second request while the first one of the elevator cars is situated at the landing in response to the first request. The dispatch controller assigns a second one of the elevator cars to travel to the landing in response to the second request.