Full Duplex Capability Signaling for CSI Reporting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing channel state information (CSI) reports for full duplex (FD) operations, leading to limitations in the number of supported reference signal resources and potential performance degradation in user equipment (UE).

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves transmitting capability signaling associated with a codebook for CSI reports, indicating the maximum number of supported reference signal resources for codebook reporting in FD operations. This capability signaling is based on changed counting criteria or codebook UE features, allowing for appropriate counting of resources for both half-duplex (HD) and FD operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the maximum number of supported reference signal resources is increased for full duplex operation, then the channel state information reporting capability is improved, but the device complexity and capability burden on the UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel state information reporting capabilityVSAvoidcapability burden on UE
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing new counting criteria specific to full duplex operation. Instead of using the same counting method as half-duplex operation, the system changes the parameter for counting reference signal resources based on the operational mode. This allows the UE to accurately report its capability for full duplex operations without being constrained by legacy counting methods, thereby improving adaptability while managing complexity through mode-specific parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the capability reporting mechanism into distinct counting criteria for different operation modes. By separating the counting methodology for half-duplex and full-duplex operations, the system can independently optimize each mode's capability assessment. This segmentation allows the UE to report capabilities specific to full duplex operations without conflating them with legacy half-duplex capabilities, thus improving versatility while maintaining manageable complexity through clear operational mode differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If legacy counting criteria are used for full duplex operation, then compatibility with existing systems is maintained, but the number of supported reference signal resources is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compatibilityVSAvoidnumber of supported reference signal resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the counting criteria adaptive to the operational mode. The system dynamically switches between legacy counting criteria for half-duplex operations and new full-duplex-specific counting criteria when needed. This dynamic approach maintains compatibility with existing systems during half-duplex operations while enabling enhanced capability in full-duplex mode, thus balancing reliability through compatibility with adaptability through mode-dependent resource support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by creating a unified capability reporting framework that serves both half-duplex and full-duplex operations. The framework incorporates both legacy counting criteria and new full-duplex counting criteria within a single system, allowing it to universally handle different operation modes. This multi-functional approach ensures that existing systems remain compatible while the system can also support enhanced full-duplex capabilities, thereby achieving both reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If the codebook UE features are modified for full duplex operation, then the accuracy of capability assessment is improved, but the signaling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability assessment accuracyVSAvoidsignaling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing full-duplex-specific counting criteria that are locally optimized for assessing UE capability in full-duplex operations. Instead of applying a single universal counting method, the system uses different counting criteria tailored to the specific requirements of full-duplex operations. This local optimization improves the accuracy of capability assessment for full-duplex mode while keeping the signaling complexity manageable by applying the enhanced criteria only where needed, rather than throughout the entire capability reporting framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250047351A1Capability signaling for codebook reporting in a full duplex operation
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250047351A1 patent drawing
  • US20250047351A1 patent drawing
  • US20250047351A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may transmit capability signaling associated with a codebook for a channel state information (CSI) report, the capability signaling indicating a maximum number of supported reference signal resources for codebook reporting in a full duplex operation. The UE may receive, based at least in part on the capability signaling, one or more CSI report configurations indicating a number of reference signal resources for the full duplex operation. Numerous other aspects are described.