Full-Duplex Wi-Fi Self-Interference Cancellation via Signal Processing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional full-duplex wireless relay systems face challenges in implementing interference cancellation due to long processing times and spatial restrictions, limiting network installation and performance in Wi-Fi networks.
Innovation Solution
A method for controlling medium access in full-duplex Wi-Fi networks that involves defining transmission and reception channels, calculating signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (SINR), and optimizing transmit powers to cancel self-interference and inter-client interference, using a signal processing module and precise antenna technology to enable simultaneous transmission and reception.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If full-duplex scheme is adopted for simultaneous transmission and reception, then frequency efficiency is improved, but self-interference occurs at the access point
Solution Approach 1:
The patent converts the harmful self-interference signal into a beneficial component by using it as a reference signal for interference cancellation. The access point utilizes its own transmitted signal, which would normally be harmful interference, to estimate and cancel the self-interference effect from received signals, thereby enabling full-duplex operation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an interference cancellation module as an intermediary component between the receiver and the signal processing unit. This module acts as a mediator that processes the received signal by subtracting the estimated self-interference component, allowing the useful signal to be extracted despite the presence of strong self-interference.
2Object-generated harmful factors
If conventional interference cancellation processing is performed, then self-interference is reduced, but processing time increases causing delay
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing the self-interference channel response matrix before actual data transmission. This pre-computation allows the interference cancellation process to proceed rapidly during operation, as the complex matrix operations are already completed and stored for quick retrieval and application.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies partial action by implementing interference cancellation only for the dominant self-interference component rather than attempting to cancel all interference sources. This selective approach focuses computational resources on the most significant interference term, achieving effective cancellation while minimizing processing time.
3Object-generated harmful factors
If transmit antenna is placed at long distance from receive antenna, then self-interference is reduced, but network installation becomes spatially restricted
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the parameter of self-interference cancellation from a spatial solution (distance separation) to a signal processing solution (digital cancellation). By transforming the problem from physical domain to signal domain, the system achieves interference reduction without requiring large spatial separation, thereby maintaining installation flexibility.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the mechanical/spatial approach (physical distance separation between antennas) with a signal processing approach (digital interference cancellation). This substitution eliminates the need for spatial constraints, allowing compact installations while effectively reducing self-interference through computational methods.
Data Source
AI summary
The present invention includes: defining a transmission signal generated by the AP and a transmitter (TX) configured to transmit a signal to the AP and reception signals generated by the AP and receivers (RXs) configured to receive a signal from the AP, and canceling self-interference in consideration of a channel gain of the self-interference at the AP; defining a channel transmitted from the TX to the AP as uplink, defining a channel transmitted from the AP to the RX as downlink, and deriving a signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) for a signal transmittable on the uplink and the downlink; selecting an RX capable of maximizing a capacity sum of transmit powers of the AP and the TX; and selecting optimum transmit powers of the AP and the TX for maximizing SINRs of transmission on the uplink and the downlink.


