Full-kit task scheduling for project delay reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Project scheduling is challenging due to uncertainties and dependencies, leading to frequent delays and budget overruns, as existing methods fail to effectively manage the complexities of project execution and resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of full-kit tasks, which are zero-duration tasks that represent preparatory actions for phases or projects, allowing for better management of dependencies and uncertainties by creating a full-kit date and enabling phased execution, with compliance and delay reporting mechanisms to optimize project timelines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional project scheduling methods are used, then project plans can be created, but uncertainties and dependencies cause frequent delays and budget overruns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject completion reliabilityVSAvoidproject delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by creating full-kit tasks that represent preparatory actions for phases or projects. These tasks are defined before the actual work begins, allowing all necessary components, resources, and dependencies to be identified and prepared in advance. The full-kit date is calculated by summing task durations and buffers in reverse from the project end date, ensuring all preparatory work is completed before the phase starts, thereby reducing uncertainties and delays during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If full-kit tasks are implemented to manage dependencies, then project execution becomes smoother, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject execution efficiencyVSAvoidproject management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the project into full-kit tasks that represent distinct preparatory actions for different phases. Each full-kit task is a separate, manageable unit with its own full-kit date calculated independently. This segmentation allows the complex project to be broken down into smaller, more manageable components while maintaining overall coordination through the task dependency network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses full-kit tasks as intermediary elements between the project planning system and actual phase execution. These tasks serve as mediators that capture all dependencies, resources, and preparations needed before a phase can begin. The full-kit date acts as an intermediary timeline marker that coordinates between upstream dependencies and downstream phase start dates, simplifying the overall project management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If full-kit tasks are created with release conditions, then compliance can be monitored, but the number of tasks and management overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance monitoring accuracyVSAvoidtask management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by implementing release conditions for full-kit tasks that must be satisfied before a phase can begin. The system monitors whether these conditions are met and provides feedback through compliance reports that track the status of full-kit tasks against their release conditions. This automated feedback mechanism enables precise compliance monitoring without requiring manual tracking, as the system automatically generates reports showing whether full-kit tasks were completed on time and whether release conditions were satisfied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8626542B1Full-kit management in projects: computing the full-kit delay
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 REALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8626542B1 patent drawing
  • US8626542B1 patent drawing
  • US8626542B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses are described for creating and using full-kit tasks, monitoring the progress of full-kit tasks, determining full-kit dates, checking compliance of release conditions associated with full-kit tasks, and/or computing and reporting full-kit task delays. A full-kit task can be used in the project plan to represent the preparations that are required or recommended to be performed before executing a set of tasks. The full-kit task can be a zero-duration task that has a full-kit date and that includes a list of items which need to be completed by the full-kit date. The full-kit task is capable of being in one of the following states: not started, in progress, released, and completed. In some embodiments, the set of tasks associated with the full-kit task can only be started if the full-kit task is either in the released state or the completed state.