Fumigant Emission Stack with Controlled Release to Reduce Goods Damage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for systems and methods to control the release of fumigating agents from fumigation systems to comply with various laws and regulations while minimizing damage to goods.

Innovation Solution

A controlled emission system that includes an emission chimney, ducts connecting sealed fumigation shrouds or containers to the chimney, fumigation exhaust fans, and chimney exhaust fans, along with dampers and bleed air inlets, to control the release of fumigants in a timely and controlled manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the fumigating agent is released quickly from the enclosure, then compliance with emission regulations is improved, but the goods may be damaged due to abrupt exposure changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission release speedVSAvoidgoods damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The emission release system uses periodic action by controlling dampers to open and close in sequences, releasing fumigant in controlled intervals rather than all at once. This allows the fumigant concentration to decrease gradually, preventing sudden exposure changes that could damage goods while still achieving timely emission removal to comply with regulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic control through multiple dampers that can be adjusted independently to regulate the emission release rate. This dynamic adjustment allows optimization of the release speed to balance between quick emission removal and gentle transition to protect goods, resolving the contradiction between release speed and goods protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If the fumigating agent exposure time to goods is extended, then emission compliance is improved, but the goods are exposed to harmful factors longer increasing damage risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefumigant release amountVSAvoidexposure time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The emission release process is segmented into multiple stages controlled by different dampers (e.g., first damper, second damper). Each segment releases a portion of the fumigant over a specific time period, allowing the total fumigant amount to be released while distributing the exposure time across multiple controlled intervals, thereby reducing peak exposure duration while maintaining total emission compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by preparing the emission release plan that prioritizes removing the majority of fumigant quickly through initial damper openings, then transitions to slower release phases. This preliminary rapid removal reduces the overall exposure time while still achieving complete fumigant discharge required for emission compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If rapid cooling of fruit is implemented, then productivity is improved, but the fruit is more susceptible to damage during handling and moving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling speedVSAvoidfruit damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling process uses periodic action by alternating between rapid cooling phases and brief pauses. During rapid cooling phases, temperature decreases quickly to improve productivity. During pause phases, the fruit is allowed to acclimate, reducing thermal stress and susceptibility to damage during subsequent handling and moving operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively controls the emission of fumigants, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards while minimizing exposure time to prevent damage to goods, thus protecting health, safety, and the environment.

Implementation Method 1

at least one chimney exhaust fan to move the fumigant through and out the emission chimney

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

combining the fluid and pollutant with ambient air in the emission chimney

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS12298023B2Air emission stack, controlled emission release
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 ECOLAB USA INC
  • US12298023B2 patent drawing
  • US12298023B2 patent drawing
  • US12298023B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Many import and export regulations require fumigation of goods, such as products or commodities, to ensure that non-native pests are not introduced. The fumigating process can involve placing the goods in a sealed containment system, and introducing the sealed good to a fumigant, such as methyl bromide gas, for a predetermined amount of time. After fumigation, regulations may require how to dispense the fumigant. The fumigant can be exhausted through fans, baffles, dampers, filters, and a chimney, as part of an emission system, in a controlled manner. The controlled manner can include combining the fumigant with ambient air and releasing or exhausting the combination over an amount of time, which mitigates pollution by the fumigant. The time-period is not specific, and instead is the time needed to meet regulatory requirements.