Function Split Structure for Mobile Optical Fronthaul

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing CPRI-based fronthaul in next-generation mobile networks faces challenges with high capacity and cost requirements due to increased bandwidth demands from massive MIMO and bandwidth increases, necessitating an optimal function split structure for wireless base stations to enhance transmission efficiency and reduce implementation complexity.

Innovation Solution

A function split structure for a mobile convergence optical transmission network is introduced, featuring a centralized unit (CU), distributed unit (DU), transport node (TN), aggregated unit (AU), and radio unit (RU), with the AU performing PHY upper layer functions, modulating and demodulating L2 data, and collecting channel state information for coordinated multi-point technology, and the DU and TN connected via a MAC-PHY split structure, and the AU and RU connected via an intra PHY split structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If CPRI-based fronthaul is used in next-generation mobile networks with massive MIMO and bandwidth increases, then transmission capacity is improved, but construction cost and implementation complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefronthaul transmission capacityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the base station into multiple functional units (CU, DU, AU, RU) with different processing capabilities. The AU (aggregated unit) is introduced as a new segment that handles PHY upper layer functions, separating critical functions from the RU and enabling flexible deployment configurations that reduce overall system complexity while maintaining high transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics through flexible function allocation where the AU can be configured with different processing capabilities depending on deployment scenarios. The system allows dynamic adjustment of function distribution between units, enabling optimization of transmission capacity while adapting to varying implementation complexity requirements in different network environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If function split structure is implemented to reduce fronthaul bandwidth, then transmission cost is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefronthaul bandwidthVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the base station functions across multiple units (CU, DU, AU, RU) with the AU specifically handling PHY upper layer functions. This segmentation enables the fronthaul to carry only essential data rather than all processing functions, significantly reducing required bandwidth while the modular architecture manages the resulting system complexity through standardized interfaces and clear functional boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The AU serves as an intermediary unit between the RU and higher-layer units, mediating the function split by handling PHY upper layer processing locally. This intermediary structure reduces fronthaul bandwidth requirements by preventing unnecessary data from traveling across the network, while its standardized interface design helps manage the complexity introduction through predictable integration points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If coordinated multi-point technology is implemented to improve throughput for cell boundary users, then user performance is improved, but implementation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser throughputVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing the AU with multi-functional capabilities that can perform CoMP (coordinated multi-point) processing, channel state information collection from multiple RUs, and precoding operations. This universal design consolidates CoMP functionality into a single unit type rather than requiring complex distributed implementations, improving user throughput while managing complexity through functional consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by having multiple RUs (radio units) that can be instantiated at different locations, each capable of collecting channel state information. The AU then processes information from these copies to enable CoMP technology, improving throughput for cell boundary users while managing complexity through standardized copying of functional blocks rather than custom implementations at each site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11515948B2Function split structure for mobile convergence optical transmission network and method of providing coordinated multi-point technology using the same
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US11515948B2 patent drawing
  • US11515948B2 patent drawing
  • US11515948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a function split structure for a mobile convergence optical transmission network and a method of providing coordinated multi-point technology using the same. The mobile convergence optical transmission network may include a centralized unit (CU), a distributed unit (DU) connected to the CU, a transport node (TN) of an optical transmission network connected to the DU via a first interface, an aggregated unit (AU) connected to a transport unit (TU) of the optical transmission network via the first interface, and a radio unit (RU) connected to the AU via a second interface corresponding to a split structure for a lower layer than the first interface.