Functional Sensor Triggers for Enterprise Task Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing enterprise data systems face inefficiencies in managing business processes due to frequent and unnecessary background processing, leading to delays, wasted compute resources, and transaction errors, particularly during high transaction volumes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a functional sensor system that monitors data transactions and triggers tasks only when predefined conditions are met, allowing for real-time processing and efficient resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If background processing is performed frequently to ensure data accuracy and compliance, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to wasted compute resources and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracy and complianceVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts background processing frequency based on real-time transaction volumes and risk assessments. During high-volume periods, processing is reduced to maintain productivity, while during low-volume periods, processing intensity increases to ensure data accuracy and compliance. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the system flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes processing parameters (frequency, intensity, resource allocation) based on monitored conditions such as transaction volumes, data criticality, and system load. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system can maintain high reliability when needed while preserving productivity during normal operations, thus resolving the contradiction between these two opposing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If background processing is performed continuously to maintain up-to-date data, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of energy increases due to unnecessary compute resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata currency and accuracyVSAvoidcompute resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous processing, the system implements periodic background processing triggered by specific events or time intervals. Processing occurs periodically when transactions are detected or at scheduled intervals, rather than continuously. This periodic approach maintains data accuracy by updating information regularly while dramatically reducing energy consumption by idle processing between updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors its own state and autonomously determines when background processing is necessary based on transaction volumes and data freshness requirements. This self-service capability allows the system to activate processing only when needed, avoiding unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining measurement precision through condition-based updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If background processing is performed at high frequency to ensure real-time data availability, then speed is improved, but loss of time increases due to transaction errors requiring reprocessing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availability rateVSAvoidreprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor transaction outcomes and data quality in real-time. When errors are detected, the feedback loop triggers targeted reprocessing only for affected transactions rather than blanket reprocessing. This feedback-driven approach maintains speed by quickly identifying and correcting errors while minimizing time loss by avoiding unnecessary reprocessing of correct transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation and error checking before transactions are finalized, preventing errors from occurring in the first place. By conducting preliminary actions such as data validation, format checking, and constraint verification, the system reduces the need for subsequent reprocessing, thereby maintaining speed while minimizing time loss from error correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260064463A1Framework to configure and generate operational data signals for controls
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20260064463A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064463A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064463A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and other embodiments associated with a framework to configure and generate operational data signals for controls are described. In one embodiment, a method includes accepting input that defines a configuration for a functional sensor in a metadata repository of an enterprise data system. The configuration specifies condition(s) on data source(s) for triggering a signal associated with initiation of a task. The method monitors the data source(s) of the enterprise data system with the functional sensor for transaction changes that satisfy the condition(s) for triggering the signal. The method detects a transaction change that satisfies the condition(s) using the functional sensor. The method emits the signal in response to detection that the condition(s) for triggering the signal are satisfied. And, in response to receiving the signal, the method automatically executes the task in the enterprise data system.