Fund Transfer Control Number System for Pre-Paid Accounts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for person-to-person fund transfers lack efficient methods for transferring funds to pre-paid instrument accounts, particularly in ensuring secure and automated processing of transactions between multiple agent systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for transferring funds from a sender to a pre-paid instrument account involve receiving and approving transfer requests, selecting and associating money transfer control numbers, and facilitating redemption, utilizing a computer system to manage and communicate these processes between agent systems, ensuring secure and efficient funding of the recipient's account.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processing methods are used for person-to-person fund transfers, then flexibility in handling diverse transfer scenarios is maintained, but processing efficiency and transaction speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidsystem automation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fund transfer process into distinct phases: initiation phase (sender submits request), processing phase (system validates and creates control numbers), and redemption phase (recipient claims funds). Each phase is handled by specific system components, enabling automated high-speed processing while maintaining flexibility through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces money transfer control numbers as intermediary identifiers that mediate between the sender's transfer request and the recipient's redemption action. These control numbers enable automated tracking and verification without requiring direct communication between sender and recipient, thus speeding up processing while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If pre-paid instrument accounts are used as default pay-out method, then transaction costs are reduced and processing efficiency is improved, but adaptability to alternative payment methods deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefund transfer efficiencyVSAvoidpayment method flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed with multi-functionality to handle both pre-paid instrument accounts and alternative payment methods. The core automated processing framework remains the same, but the system can adapt to different payout mechanisms through configurable parameters, thus maintaining efficiency while providing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by defaulting to pre-paid instrument account funding, which streamlines the transfer process and reduces costs. However, the system maintains the capability to accommodate alternative payment methods when specifically requested, balancing efficiency with adaptability through default configurations rather than rigid constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple agent systems are involved in the transfer process, then system versatility and user accessibility are improved, but transaction security and processing reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagent system compatibilityVSAvoidtransaction processing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where each agent system reports transaction status and verification results back to the central processing system. The system uses money transfer control numbers to track and verify transactions across multiple agent systems, ensuring that each step is confirmed before proceeding, thus maintaining reliability while supporting multiple agents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation and creates control numbers before the actual fund transfer occurs. This beforehand cushioning ensures that all necessary checks are completed in advance, reducing the risk of errors when multiple agent systems are involved, and maintaining high reliability across the distributed network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS12079786B2Systems and methods for transferring funds to a pre-paid account
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 WESTERN UNION CO
  • US12079786B2 patent drawing
  • US12079786B2 patent drawing
  • US12079786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to the invention, a method for transferring funds from a sender to a pre-paid account to be assigned to a recipient is disclosed. The method may include receiving a request to perform a funds transfer, including an amount and a recipient, and determining whether to approve the request. Upon approval, the method may include selecting a first and second money transfer control number (MTCN). The method may include recording an association of the amount and the recipient with the first MTCN, and an association of the two MTCN's. The method may include sending the second MTCN out and later receiving a request to redeem which includes the second MTCN. The method may include determining the first MTCN based on the second MTCN, and whether to approve the request. Upon approval, an indication may be sent that the amount is available for funding of the pre-paid account of the recipient.