Furnace Burner Flow Control for Tube Temperature Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Steam hydrocarbon reformers face challenges in maintaining uniform temperatures across process tubes, leading to inefficiencies and reduced operational life due to axial temperature variations and tube-to-tube variability, exacerbated by uncertainties in temperature measurements and complex interactions between multiple burners.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the selection of target temperature criteria, measurement of temperature information, and adjustment of burner flow rates using a mathematical function to minimize temperature differences and probability of exceeding limit temperatures, characterized by a gain matrix representing the relationship between burner flow rate changes and temperature changes in process tubes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional furnace control methods are used to adjust overall fuel flow to control temperature, then temperature control is achieved, but tube-to-tube temperature variability cannot be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformity across tubesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the furnace control into individual tube-level control segments. Each tube's temperature is monitored independently and controlled by adjusting the flow rate of specific burners affecting that tube, rather than controlling the entire furnace as one unit. This segmentation enables reduction of tube-to-tube temperature variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making the control system responsive to local temperature conditions of individual tubes. The control algorithm adjusts burner flow rates based on specific temperature measurements from particular tubes, creating localized control zones that address tube-to-tube variability while maintaining overall furnace temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If temperature measurements are taken at specific locations on reformer tubes, then temperature data is obtained, but measurement uncertainty increases due to inconsistency in measurement locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where temperature measurements from specific locations on tubes are continuously monitored and fed back to the control algorithm. The system uses this feedback to adjust burner flow rates to maintain target temperatures, compensating for measurement uncertainties through continuous correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from requiring perfectly consistent measurement locations to using measurement location as a variable parameter. The control algorithm accounts for variations in measurement locations by using relative temperature changes and trends rather than absolute values, making the system robust to measurement location inconsistencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If burner flow rates are adjusted to control individual tube temperatures, then tube temperature uniformity is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformityVSAvoidburner control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal control algorithm that can be applied to all tubes in the furnace using the same mathematical model and control logic. This multi-functional approach handles temperature control for multiple tubes simultaneously, reducing the complexity that would arise from designing separate control systems for each tube.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a mathematical model as an intermediary between temperature measurements and burner control actions. This model predicts the relationship between burner flow rate changes and resulting temperature changes, simplifying the control complexity by providing a systematic framework rather than requiring direct trial-and-error control for each tube.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If excess oxidant is used in combustion to ensure complete burning, then combustion reliability is improved, but energy efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion completenessVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts oxidant flow rates based on real-time temperature measurements and control requirements. Rather than maintaining constant excess oxidant flow, the system optimizes oxidant supply to match actual combustion needs, improving energy efficiency while maintaining reliable combustion through continuous adaptation to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances energy efficiency, reduces operational costs by maintaining uniform temperatures, and extends the operational life of process tubes by optimizing burner flow rates and reducing excess oxidant usage.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of burners for heating the process tubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

Flame radiation heating of the reformer tubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 3

process tubes (including configurations with more than 400 reactor tubes), each tube containing catalyst (for example, a reforming catalyst) for transporting a process fluid (for example, steam and a hydrocarbon)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

The tubes can extend vertically about 12 meters and have an outer diameter of 100 to 150 millimeters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 5

Process tubes may cool due to endothermic reaction even as heat is added from the furnace

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS10746470B2Method of operating a furnace
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US10746470B2 patent drawing
  • US10746470B2 patent drawing
  • US10746470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a furnace having process tubes and multiple burners where it is desired to conform the temperatures of the process tubes to selected target temperature criterion. The present method provides a systematic and quantitative approach to determine how to adjust burner flow rates to result in desired tube wall temperatures, for example, using objective functions to decrease the probability that temperatures pertaining to the plurality of process tubes exceed their selected limit temperatures. An objective function can also be used to reduce the excess oxidant requirement for the furnace.