Furnace Ignition Pressure Sequencing for Safe Fuel Cutoff

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Furnace systems face challenges in safely starting and operating due to inconsistent air pressure readings, which can lead to inefficient fuel usage and potential safety hazards if the air pressure thresholds are not accurately met before ignition.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a controller that initiates a start sequence by starting an inducer fan and using pressure sensors to ensure air pressure in the collector portion is above specific thresholds before igniting the burner assembly, with an ignition timer to monitor and adjust fuel supply based on pressure readings, ensuring safe and efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the furnace system uses a single pressure threshold for ignition control, then the control logic is simple, but air pressure readings may be inconsistent leading to safety hazards and fuel wastage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition safetyVSAvoidcontrol logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single pressure threshold into multiple sequential thresholds (first threshold at 0.50 inches water column, second threshold at 1.00 inch water column). This segmentation allows the system to verify pressure conditions in stages, ensuring more reliable ignition safety while maintaining manageable control logic through structured sequential evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary pressure verification by checking if pressure exceeds the first threshold before allowing ignition to proceed. This preliminary action ensures that basic pressure conditions are met before fuel is introduced, preventing unsafe ignition attempts and reducing fuel wastage from failed ignition cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the furnace system ignores air pressure conditions and proceeds with ignition, then the operation is faster, but fuel is wasted and safety hazards occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition speedVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a quick preliminary check of the first pressure threshold (0.50 inches water column) before ignition. This preliminary action is designed to be fast, allowing the system to quickly determine whether pressure conditions are sufficient to proceed, thereby maintaining ignition speed while preventing fuel wastage from premature ignition attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors pressure conditions and provides feedback to the control logic. If pressure does not meet the required thresholds, the system receives feedback to delay or prevent ignition, avoiding fuel consumption. This feedback mechanism ensures that ignition only occurs when pressure conditions are verified, eliminating unnecessary fuel wastage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the furnace system uses multiple pressure thresholds with timing verification, then fuel supply control is precise and safe, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel supply controlVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional blocks: a first sensor evaluating the first threshold, a second sensor evaluating the second threshold, and an ignition timer coordinating the sequence. This segmentation makes the complex multi-threshold control more manageable by dividing it into independent, testable components with clear responsibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ignition timer acts as an intermediary between the pressure sensors and the fuel supply control. It coordinates the sequential evaluation of thresholds and manages the timing of ignition decisions, simplifying the overall control architecture by providing a centralized timing mechanism that mediates between sensor inputs and actuator outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If the furnace system delays ignition until pressure is verified, then safety is improved, but startup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition safetyVSAvoidstartup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary pressure verification of the first threshold before ignition preparation begins. This preliminary action is designed to be completed quickly, ensuring that basic safety conditions are met early in the startup sequence, thereby minimizing the time delay while maintaining ignition safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic checking of pressure conditions during the startup sequence, with the ignition timer creating structured intervals for verification. This periodic approach allows the system to efficiently monitor pressure conditions without continuous delay, balancing safety verification with timely ignition execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures safe and efficient furnace operation by ensuring air pressure thresholds are met before ignition, preventing fuel wastage and potential safety hazards by precisely controlling the fuel supply based on real-time pressure readings.

Implementation Method 1

The system starts an inducer blower that creates a negative pressure in a collector box of the furnace by drawing air from a combustion air inlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a first pressure sensor operative to sense a pressure in the collector portion, a second pressure sensor operative to sense a second pressure in the collector portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 3

igniting the fuel and air mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS10094591B2Furnace control system and method
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 CARRIER CORP
  • US10094591B2 patent drawing
  • US10094591B2 patent drawing
  • US10094591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a furnace system includes initiating a start sequence comprising starting an inducer fan operative to induce an air flow through a burner assembly, a heat exchanger portion and a collector portion, determining whether an air pressure in the collector portion is above a first threshold value, starting a furnace ignition sequence including providing fuel to the burner assembly, igniting a fuel and air mixture and starting an ignition timer responsive to determining that the air pressure in the collector portion is above the first threshold value, determining whether the ignition timer has expired, determining whether the air pressure in the collector portion is above a second threshold value responsive to determining that the ignition timer has expired, and stopping the provision of fuel to the burner assembly responsive to determining that the air pressure in the collector portion is not above the second threshold value.