Furnace Control Using Regression Feedback for Tapping Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Secondary metal recycling processes face variability in scrap material composition and furnace conditions, leading to inconsistent operational efficiency and productivity due to lack of a consistent method for determining when metal is ready for tapping, resulting in errors in energy calculation and increased energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that utilizes real-time and historical data to model performance and adjust furnace operations through a regression analysis, providing real-time feedback to correct suboptimal performance by separating variables affecting metal oxidation and energy balance, thereby optimizing furnace performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional operator judgment methods are used to determine tapping temperature, then operational flexibility is maintained, but measurement precision and manufacturing precision deteriorate due to ambiguity and operator experience dependence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetapping temperature determination accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring furnace operational parameters (temperature, power input, charge composition) and using regression models to predict metal temperature and oxidation state. This feedback loop enables automated adjustment of tapping timing and furnace parameters, replacing subjective operator judgment with objective data-driven decisions, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring complex additional hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical method of operator visual inspection and manual judgment with a computational system using regression analysis and data processing. The controller system substitutes human sensory and cognitive processes with automated algorithms that analyze operational data to determine optimal tapping temperature, eliminating ambiguity and experience dependence while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If real-time data collection and regression analysis are implemented, then manufacturing precision and productivity improve, but device complexity and use of energy increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemelting cycle efficiencyVSAvoidcontroller system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller system performs multiple functions using a single integrated platform: data collection from sensors, historical data storage, regression analysis computation, real-time parameter prediction, and control signal generation. By consolidating these functions into one multi-functional system rather than separate dedicated devices, the patent improves productivity while limiting the increase in overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the furnace's own operational data (temperature readings, power input, charge composition) to self-optimize its performance. The regression models are trained on historical data from the same furnace, enabling the system to learn and adapt to its specific characteristics without requiring external complex infrastructure, thereby improving productivity with minimal additional complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If furnace operational parameters are adjusted frequently to accommodate scrap variability, then adaptability improves, but loss of energy increases due to inconsistent heating cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescrap material variability accommodationVSAvoidheating energy inefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of charge material composition and furnace state before initiating the heating cycle. Regression models predict the optimal heating trajectory and required energy input based on pre-assessed parameters such as scrap type, moisture content, and furnace temperature. This preliminary action enables the system to adapt to material variability while minimizing energy losses by avoiding unnecessary heating adjustments during the cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts furnace parameters (power input, heating rate) in real-time based on monitored operational data and regression model predictions. Rather than using fixed heating cycles, the system adapts its heating strategy to match the specific characteristics of each charge batch, improving adaptability to scrap variability while optimizing energy efficiency by applying heat only when and where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If higher temperatures are used to ensure complete melting, then manufacturing precision improves, but use of energy and loss of substance increase due to metal oxidation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemelting completenessVSAvoidmetal oxidation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors furnace temperature, charge composition, and heating rate, using regression models to predict the actual metal temperature and oxidation state. This feedback enables the controller to maintain the minimum necessary temperature for complete melting without excessive overheating, thereby ensuring manufacturing precision while minimizing metal oxidation losses through precise temperature control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes multiple parameters simultaneously (temperature, heating rate, atmosphere composition, holding time) rather than relying solely on high temperature. By changing and coordinating these parameters, the system achieves complete melting with reduced peak temperatures and shorter exposure times, thereby ensuring manufacturing precision while reducing metal oxidation losses through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11740022B2Furnace controller and method of operating a furnace
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US11740022B2 patent drawing
  • US11740022B2 patent drawing
  • US11740022B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control scheme for a furnace can use real-time and historical data to model performance and determine relationships between different data and performance parameters for use in correcting suboptimal performance of the furnace in real-time. Operational parameters can be logged throughout the cycle for all cycles for a period of time in order to establish a baseline. This data can then be used to calculate the performance of the process. A regression analysis can be carried out in order to determine which parameters affect different aspects of performance. These relationships can then be used to predict performance during a single cycle in real-time and provide closed or open loop feedback to control furnace operation to result in enhanced performance.