Furniture Drive Dual-Sensor Triggering for Drawer Position Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing furniture drives face challenges in minimizing unintentional triggering, particularly when a drawer is fully open and subject to loading or unloading forces, which can lead to accidental activation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of two sensors with different triggering sensitivities, where one sensor is coupled to a mechanical setting sensor independent of the gear mechanism and reacts immediately to user forces, while the other is mechanically coupled to the transmission, providing varying sensitivity based on the drawer's position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single sensor with fixed triggering threshold is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of preventing unintentional triggering deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system complexityVSAvoidunintentional triggering prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sensing function into two separate sensors: a first sensor coupled to the transmission for detecting drawer position, and a second sensor coupled to the mechanical positioning sensor for detecting user force. This segmentation allows each sensor to have optimized triggering thresholds for different operational contexts, improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic triggering thresholds that automatically adjust based on the drawer's position detected by the first sensor. When the drawer is in the closed end position, a lower threshold is applied; when partially or fully open, a higher threshold is applied. This dynamic adaptation prevents unintentional triggering during loading/unloading operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the triggering threshold is lowered to detect user force, then the sensitivity to user input is improved, but the risk of unintentional triggering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser force detection sensitivityVSAvoidunintentional triggering
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different triggering thresholds (different local qualities) based on the drawer's position. The second sensor uses a lower threshold when the drawer is closed to ensure responsive user force detection, while the first sensor provides position information that triggers a higher threshold when the drawer is open, preventing unintentional activation during loading/unloading

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit continuously receives feedback from both sensors and dynamically adjusts the triggering threshold based on the drawer position detected by the first sensor. This feedback mechanism ensures that the system adapts its sensitivity in real-time to prevent unintentional triggering while maintaining user responsiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If the sensor is mechanically coupled to the transmission, then the device complexity is reduced, but the response speed to user force deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor coupling mechanismVSAvoidtriggering response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sensing system into two independent sensing paths: one through the transmission (first sensor) and one directly through the mechanical positioning sensor (second sensor). The second sensor's direct coupling to the mechanical positioning sensor provides immediate response to user force without the inertia of the transmission mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical positioning sensor acts as an intermediary that directly translates drawer movement into sensor signals for the second sensor, bypassing the transmission mechanism. This intermediary approach enables fast response to user force while the first sensor coupled to the transmission provides position verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2642899B1Furniture with furniture drive
Publication Date: 2018.04.04 JULIUS BLUM GMBH
  • EP2642899B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2642899B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2642899B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

A furniture drive (1) having: - an output drive (2) for transmitting force to a movable furniture part (11), - an electric motor(3), - a gear mechanism (4) which is connected between the electric motor (3) and the output drive (2), - a switching device (5) for switching the electric motor (3), - a first sensor (6), it being possible for the signals from said sensor to be supplied to the switching device (5), wherein the first sensor (6) is mechanically coupled to the gear mechanism (4), wherein a second sensor (7) is provided, it being possible for the signals from said second sensor to be supplied to the switching device (5), and wherein the second sensor (7) is coupled to a mechanical actuating sensor (8) independently of the gear mechanism (4), and wherein the switching device (5) switches on the electric motor (3) when a signal is received from the first or second sensor (6, 7), and an item of furniture having a furniture drive of this kind.