1H-Furo[3,2-b]imidazo[4,5-d]pyridine Synthesis via Segmented Steps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for synthesizing 1H-furo[3,2-b]imidazo[4,5-d]pyridine compounds are costly, complex, and not suitable for industrial scale due to high impurities and difficult process control.

Innovation Solution

A method involving reacting compound 1 with compound 2 or its hydrochloride in the presence of a base, followed by reduction and ring-closing reactions, using specific solvents and catalysts to obtain 1H-furo[3,2-b]imidazo[4,5-d]pyridine compounds with high yield and fewer impurities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If prior art synthesis methods are used, then 1H-furo[3,2-b]imidazo[4,5-d]pyridine compounds can be synthesized, but the process is costly and complex with high impurities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidsynthesis process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The synthesis process is divided into three distinct steps: (1) condensation of compound 1 with compound 2 to form intermediate 3, (2) reduction of intermediate 3 to form intermediate 4, and (3) ring-closing reaction of intermediate 4 with compound 5 to yield the final product. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently, improving overall purity while reducing process complexity compared to one-pot methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces specific intermediates (compound 3 and compound 4) that facilitate the transformation from starting materials to final product. These intermediates serve as controlled stepping stones, allowing precise control over the synthesis pathway and enabling purification at each stage, thereby reducing final product impurities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If prior art synthesis methods are used, then compounds can be produced, but the operation is difficult to control and not suitable for industrial scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindustrial scalabilityVSAvoidprocess control ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes reaction parameters at each step: using specific bases (DBU, Na2CO3, KHCO3, or NaHCO3), controlling temperature ranges (50-80°C for step 1, 15-90°C for step 2, 80-120°C for step 3), and adjusting solvent systems (ethanol/acetonitrile mixtures). These parameter optimizations make the process more controllable and suitable for industrial scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The synthesis method employs readily available reagents and standard laboratory equipment, eliminating the need for specialized facilities or complex process control systems. The three-step sequence uses common solvents (ethanol, acetonitrile, toluene) and standard purification techniques, making the process self-sufficient and easily scalable to industrial production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If prior art synthesis methods are used, then products can be obtained, but the cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction yieldVSAvoidsynthesis cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs straightforward purification methods at each step (filtration, extraction, crystallization) that recover unreacted starting materials and intermediates for potential reuse. The simple work-up procedures minimize material loss and reduce the need for expensive purification techniques, thereby lowering overall synthesis costs while maintaining high yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves high yield, reduces impurities, simplifies operation, and lowers costs, making it suitable for industrial-scale production.

Implementation Method 1

reacting compound 1 with compound 2 or compound 2 hydrochloride in a solvent in the presence of a base to obtain compound 3

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the compound 3 to a reduction reaction to obtain compound 4 or compound 4 hydrochloride

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction reaction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

subjecting the compound 4 or compound 4 hydrochloride to a ring-closing reaction with compound 5 or compound 5′ to obtain compound 6

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRing-closing reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS20250171458A1Method for synthesizing 1h-furo[3,2-b]imidazo[4,5-d]pyridine compound
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 HANGZHOU HIGHLIGHTLL PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
  • US20250171458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250171458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250171458A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for synthesizing 1H-furo[3,2-b]imidazo[4,5-d]pyridine compounds. The method comprises the following steps of: reacting compound 1 with compound 2 in a solvent in the presence of a base to obtain compound 3; subjecting the compound 3 to a reduction reaction to obtain compound 4; and subjecting the compound 4 to a ring-closing reaction with compound 5 or compound 5′ to obtain compound 6 or a hydrate thereof, wherein R is methyl or ethyl, the methyl or ethyl is optionally substituted by hydroxyl, and X═O or CH2. The method for synthesizing the 1H-furo[3,2-b]imidazo[4,5-d]pyridine compound has the advantages of high yield, fewer impurities and is easy to control, saves the cost. The method is simple and convenient to operate, and is suitable for industrial scale.