Furrow Evaluation Imaging for Consistent Seed Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Farmers face challenges in assessing critical factors such as seed resting place, spacing, depth, furrow integrity, and seed-to-soil contact during seed planting, which affect efficiency and quality, and existing solutions do not effectively monitor and improve these factors in real-time.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating cameras into planter row units to capture image data, analyze it for quality, and provide feedback on camera confidence and furrow depth consistency, allowing for automated adjustments to improve planting quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If cameras are added to monitor seed planting quality, then measurement precision of furrow depth and quality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefurrow depth measurementVSAvoidcamera system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The camera system is designed to perform multiple functions: capturing images for furrow depth measurement, assessing seed placement quality, evaluating furrow integrity, and providing real-time feedback. This multi-functionality justifies the added device complexity by delivering comprehensive planting quality monitoring from a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms where captured images are processed and analyzed to provide immediate information about planting quality. This feedback loop enables operators to make adjustments during operation, transforming the complex camera system into a self-correcting monitoring tool that continuously improves planting accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If real-time image processing is performed to assess planting quality, then productivity through immediate feedback is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time quality assessmentVSAvoidimage processing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system processes images at selective intervals rather than continuously analyzing every captured frame. By processing a representative subset of images, the system achieves sufficient real-time feedback for productivity improvement while significantly reducing the energy consumption associated with continuous full-image processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple factors governing seed planting quality are monitored, then manufacturing precision of seed placement is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseed placement qualityVSAvoidmultiple quality factors
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The complex task of monitoring multiple planting quality factors is segmented into distinct analytical components: furrow depth measurement, seed placement detection, furrow integrity assessment, and soil contact evaluation. Each segment is processed separately through dedicated image analysis algorithms, making the overall complex measurement task more manageable and accurate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4581918A1Method for evaluating a furrow
Publication Date: 2025.07.09 DEERE & CO
  • EP4581918A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4581918A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4581918A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for evaluating a furrow (202) created by an agricultural machine (14). The method includes obtaining image data of the furrow (202) from a camera (62) associated with the agricultural machine (14); processing the image data for a time interval and identifying camera quality images; determining from the camera quality images a quantity of inconsistent camera quality images; and providing camera quality feedback based on the quantity of inconsistent camera quality images.