Fuse Chamber Geometry for Blast and Debris Attenuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Melamine fuses lack a mechanism to effectively control the blast path during an overcurrent event, which can lead to uncontrolled debris movement and potential electrical conductivity, failing to prevent damage to circuitry components.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating special layers with geometric elements into the fuse design, which divide the chamber holding the fusible element into sub-chambers, providing pathways for debris movement and attenuating shock strength through geometric blockages, thereby reducing the likelihood of electrical conductivity post-fuse breakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If melamine layers are stacked without filler material, then the fuse acts very fast, but the shock blast and debris are not controlled, potentially causing electrical conductivity and damage to circuitry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuse acting speedVSAvoidshock blast and debris control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuse body is segmented into multiple stacked layers with intermediate layers containing geometric elements that divide the internal chamber into sub-chambers. This segmentation controls the blast path and debris movement while maintaining the fast-acting characteristic of melamine fuses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Intermediate layers with geometric elements serve as mediators between the fusible element and the external environment. These layers attenuate the shock wave and control debris ejection without significantly slowing the fuse's response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If filler material like sand is added to prevent fire and sparks, then the harmful factors are controlled, but the fuse structure becomes more complex and may affect its fast-acting performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire and sparks preventionVSAvoidfuse structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate layers incorporate geometric elements that create a porous or latticed structure within the chamber. This structure provides blast attenuation and debris control functionality similar to filler materials, but without adding significant structural complexity or compromising the fast-acting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Stress or pressure

If the chamber is divided into sub-chambers with geometric elements, then the shock wave intensity is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock wave intensityVSAvoidlayer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chamber is segmented into sub-chambers using intermediate layers with geometric elements. This segmentation reduces shock wave intensity by distributing and attenuating the blast energy across multiple smaller volumes, while the modular layer design keeps the overall structure manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The geometric elements in the intermediate layers introduce additional dimensional complexity (patterns, shapes, configurations) within the layers themselves, allowing for effective blast attenuation without significantly increasing the overall number of layers or fuse length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The special layers effectively manage the explosive blast, reducing shock wave intensity and preventing the formation of conductive debris paths, ensuring the fuse's intended purpose is met by preventing damage to other components.

Implementation Method 1

The geometric elements provide a pathway between the first sub-chamber and the second sub-chamber... attenuating shock strength through geometric blockages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave attenuation: Shock Wave

Data Source

PatentUS11984286B2Inner chambers with blast attenuation geometry on fuses
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 LITTELFUSE INC
  • US11984286B2 patent drawing
  • US11984286B2 patent drawing
  • US11984286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuse includes multiple stacked layers, a first terminal, and a second terminal. The first terminal is connected to one end of a fusible element and the second terminal is connected to the other end. The stacked layers include first and second intermediate layers and a special layer. The first intermediate layer, which has a centrally disposed opening, is stacked on the first terminal and the second terminal. The second intermediate layer, also having a centrally disposed opening is stacked above the first intermediate layer, and the centrally disposed openings define a chamber above the fusible element. The special layer is located between the first intermediate layer and the second intermediate layer and includes one or more geometric elements. The geometric elements divide the chamber into two sub-chambers, the first sub-chamber being above the second sub-chamber.