Fuse Circuit Isolation Against Accidental Programming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrated circuits with fuses are prone to accidental programming due to power supply transients and electrical overstressing, leading to unintended changes in fuse resistance, which can result in defective semiconductor dies during manufacturing and field implementation.

Innovation Solution

A fuse circuit design that includes multiple switches and biasing circuits to control current flow through the fuse, along with protective elements like capacitors and diodes, to prevent accidental programming by isolating the fuse from undesired voltage spikes and transient events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If fuses are used to store information in integrated circuits, then manufacturing precision and unique code storage are improved, but susceptibility to accidental programming due to power supply transients and electrical overstressing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuse programming accuracyVSAvoidresistance to accidental programming
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fuse programming path is segmented into multiple series-connected switches (first switch and second switch) rather than using a single switch. This segmentation ensures that both switches must be simultaneously turned on by a genuine programming signal to program the fuse, while accidental transients or overstress events are unlikely to activate both switches simultaneously, thus preventing accidental programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first and second switches act as intermediary protective elements between the fuse and the power supply/transient events. These switches control and mediate the current flow through the fuse, allowing legitimate programming signals to pass through while blocking harmful transient currents and electrical overstress, thereby protecting the fuse from accidental programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple switches and biasing circuits are added to protect against accidental programming, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against accidental programmingVSAvoidnumber of switches and biasing circuits
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The first switch and second switch are merged into a single series connection path with the fuse, and their control logic is integrated through shared biasing circuits. This merging approach achieves enhanced protection reliability while minimizing the increase in device complexity by using a compact series architecture rather than parallel or distributed protection structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing circuits serve multiple functions: they control the switching states of both the first and second switches, provide protection against accidental programming, and enable legitimate fuse programming when required. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated protection circuits, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12183673B2Fuse circuits
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12183673B2 patent drawing
  • US12183673B2 patent drawing
  • US12183673B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Circuits, methods, and devices for protecting against accidental fuse programming are discussed herein. For example, a fuse circuit may include a fuse, a first switch coupled to a first point and coupled in series with the fuse, and a second switch coupled in series with the fuse between the fuse and a second point.