Autonomous Fuselage Assembly Fixtures for Flexible Panel Joining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for building aircraft fuselages are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly, often requiring manual fastening processes that are inefficient and limited to specific assembly facilities.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous flexible manufacturing system comprising drivable towers, cradle fixtures, and an autonomous panel joining system, which automates the process of building a fuselage assembly by autonomously driving and positioning fixtures, and using autonomous tools to join panels and support structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual fastening processes are used with human operators, then flexibility in assembly facility location is maintained, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of fastening operationsVSAvoidcomplexity of assembly system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous assembly system is divided into separate functional modules including drivable towers, fixtures for positioning, and panel joining systems. Each module operates independently but coordinates through a control system, allowing the complex automation task to be managed through modular components rather than a monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The drivable towers and fixtures are designed as multi-functional units that can perform multiple operations (positioning, fastening, inspection) and adapt to different assembly configurations. This universality reduces the overall number of specialized devices needed, managing system complexity while maintaining high automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If manual fastening operations are used, then system complexity remains low, but assembly time and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly rateVSAvoidtime for fastening operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous fastening system operates continuously without interruption by coordinating multiple drivable towers and panel joining systems that work simultaneously on different sections of the fuselage. This eliminates idle time between operations and maintains continuous productive action throughout the assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Components such as skin panels and support members are pre-positioned using fixtures before the fastening operation begins. This preliminary positioning ensures that when the autonomous fastening system engages, all components are ready for immediate joining, eliminating setup time during the actual fastening process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If handheld tools are used by human operators, then equipment cost is lower, but labor intensity and ergonomic challenges increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic conditions for operatorsVSAvoidlevel of autonomous operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

Manual handheld fastening tools operated by human workers are replaced with autonomous panel joining systems mounted on drivable towers. These automated systems perform all fastening operations without human physical intervention, completely eliminating ergonomic challenges associated with manual tool operation while achieving high-level automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If current manual assembly methods are used, then assembly facility requirements are flexible, but assembly precision and mold line compliance may be inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with mold line requirementsVSAvoidcomplexity of positioning and fastening system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous positioning system incorporates sensors and control systems that continuously monitor the position of skin panels and support members relative to mold line requirements. Real-time feedback allows the system to detect and correct positioning deviations, ensuring consistent precision without requiring overly complex mechanical positioning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The fixtures and drivable towers are designed with dynamic adjustment capabilities that allow real-time modification of positioning parameters during assembly. This dynamic adaptability enables the system to accommodate variations in component dimensions and achieve precise mold line compliance without requiring extremely rigid and complex fixed positioning structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12290852B2Autonomous flexible manufacturing system for building a fuselage
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US12290852B2 patent drawing
  • US12290852B2 patent drawing
  • US12290852B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for building a fuselage assembly for an aircraft. A number of fixtures may be drive across a floor to an assembly area to form an assembly fixture. The fuselage assembly may be built on the assembly fixture.